Jon Huntsman pulls into third place in poll

15 Dec 2011 09:07 #1 by chickaree
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-New ... -says-poll

Jon Huntsman leapfrogs Ron Paul in New Hampshire, says poll
GOP candidate Jon Huntsman has replaced Ron Paul in third place in New Hampshire, behind Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, says a new Suffolk University poll.

:woo hoo: Finally!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 09:11 #2 by The Viking

chickaree wrote: www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/...-Hampshire-says-poll

Jon Huntsman leapfrogs Ron Paul in New Hampshire, says poll
GOP candidate Jon Huntsman has replaced Ron Paul in third place in New Hampshire, behind Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, says a new Suffolk University poll.

:woo hoo: Finally!


He has no offices or organization in any other state. He is spending 100% in NH. I would hope he moves up some. But he is not even registering in any other state. But anyone who passes Ron Paul is OK in my book.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 09:24 #3 by LadyJazzer
He's still the only SANE, intelligent one of the bunch...(Which is still why he hasn't got a chance.)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 09:31 #4 by Reverend Revelant

The Viking wrote:

chickaree wrote: www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/...-Hampshire-says-poll

Jon Huntsman leapfrogs Ron Paul in New Hampshire, says poll
GOP candidate Jon Huntsman has replaced Ron Paul in third place in New Hampshire, behind Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, says a new Suffolk University poll.

:woo hoo: Finally!


He has no offices or organization in any other state. He is spending 100% in NH. I would hope he moves up some. But he is not even registering in any other state. But anyone who passes Ron Paul is OK in my book.


The real devil is in the details... "The rest of the candidates pile up an unimpressive 10 percent of the electorate between them." Perry is a loser.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 09:58 #5 by chickaree
It's the independents who ultimately decide the election, not the hard core partisans. This shows us that Huntsman could actually make this a horerace.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 10:04 #6 by AspenValley

chickaree wrote: It's the independents who ultimately decide the election, not the hard core partisans.


That's true when it comes to the general election, but for the Republicans lately, it's definitely been the hard core extremists who are coming up with the candidates. And the clown car that is the current field of candidates is the result.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 11:54 #7 by Rick
I don't believe for a second that the liberals on this board and the MSM wouldn't be slicing and dicing any flaws or mistatements made by Huntsman if he were the frontrunner. The few things liberals like about Huntsman would not be in the discussion imo. I'm sure you would prefer him over the rest, but against Obama he would be made out to be "too extreme" on all the other issues where he is to the right. The fact that you know he has a snowball's chance in hell makes it easy to make him out to be good alternative to Obama. This is my opinion...feel free to argue.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 12:26 #8 by FredHayek

LLIB wrote: I don't believe for a second that the liberals on this board and the MSM wouldn't be slicing and dicing any flaws or mistatements made by Huntsman if he were the frontrunner. The few things liberals like about Huntsman would not be in the discussion imo. I'm sure you would prefer him over the rest, but against Obama he would be made out to be "too extreme" on all the other issues where he is to the right. The fact that you know he has a snowball's chance in hell makes it easy to make him out to be good alternative to Obama. This is my opinion...feel free to argue.


Have to agree, in 2008, the Republicans choose the most moderate candidate, McCain, and he was denounced as an extreme right winger. rofllol

Notice how the Left never calls anyone a liberal or moderate Republican? Not even Olympia Snowe or Scott Brown.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 12:32 #9 by AspenValley

FredHayek wrote:

LLIB wrote: I don't believe for a second that the liberals on this board and the MSM wouldn't be slicing and dicing any flaws or mistatements made by Huntsman if he were the frontrunner. The few things liberals like about Huntsman would not be in the discussion imo. I'm sure you would prefer him over the rest, but against Obama he would be made out to be "too extreme" on all the other issues where he is to the right. The fact that you know he has a snowball's chance in hell makes it easy to make him out to be good alternative to Obama. This is my opinion...feel free to argue.


Have to agree, in 2008, the Republicans choose the most moderate candidate, McCain, and he was denounced as an extreme right winger. rofllol

Notice how the Left never calls anyone a liberal or moderate Republican? Not even Olympia Snowe or Scott Brown.


This is just incorrect.

I don't recall anyone calling McCain an "extreme right winger" during the 2008 election, although some may have called his choice for running mate that.

And I've never heard anyone call Olympia Snowe or Scott Brown "extreme right wingers" either.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Dec 2011 12:43 #10 by LadyJazzer
I don't recall that either... Perhaps if you had a source?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.141 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+