Ron Paul and his racist comments

23 Dec 2011 15:21 #1 by Reverend Revelant
I'm not sure how Ron Paul figured that these obscene comment would not become a campaign issue. And this is not the first time these newsletter statements have been highlighted, and in the pst Ron Paul's excuse was... "I didn't read everything that was published in those news letters?."

“Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began.
http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_June92_p1.pdf

The November 1990 issue of the Political Report had kind words for David Duke.
http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Nov90_p4.pdf

This December 1990 newsletter describes Martin Luther King Jr. as “a world-class adulterer”
http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Dec90_p8.pdf

A February 1991 newsletter attacks “The X-Rated Martin Luther King.”
http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Feb91_p7.pdf

An October 1990 edition of the Political Report ridicules black activists, led by Al Sharpton,
http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Oct90_p4.pdf

Read them all at...
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/988 ... -exclusive


Keep this son of a bitch out of the Republican Party. No support, no votes, no praises... he would be an embarrassment to any party. Ron Paul is not what America is about. And he knew what was in his newsletters... see this video...

Starting at 1:45, Ron Paul explains that his private sector efforts are keeping him too busy — and starts plugging his newsletters:

[youtube:vrikqs2c]

[/youtube:vrikqs2c]

But along with that, I also put out a political type of business investment newsletter that sort of covered all these areas. And it covered a lot about what was going on in Washington, and financial events, and especially some of the monetary events. Since I had been especially interested in monetary policy, had been on the banking committee, and still very interested in, in that subject, that this newsletter dealt with it. This had to do with the value of the dollar, the pros and cons of the gold standard, and of course the disadvantages of all the high taxes and spending that our government seems to continue to do.


Bastard.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Dec 2011 17:18 #2 by Martin Ent Inc
Big F'n Deal. Looks like it can all be substantiated.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Dec 2011 17:36 #3 by Reverend Revelant

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Big F'n Deal. Looks like it can all be substantiated.


Yes it can... substantiated as being written by and/or approved by him. You'll support that kind of trash like Paul?

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Dec 2011 19:57 #4 by Wily Fox aka Angela
The problem is that his "excuses" keep changing over the years. Not exactly characteristic of the politician that speaks so plainly and sufficiently on issues. He's scrambling and it is obvious. Remember when his son talked about how restaurants should be able to not serve blacks? He got elected anyway. Seems to be a family belief- how odd - white southern men saying racist things about people of color? not.... this will bury Paul finally.... it may not in Iowa (not too many people of color there), but I think his younger following had no idea about his past until now. I don't think they will stick with him.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Dec 2011 20:36 #5 by BearMtnHIB
Thanks to idiots like Dr. Fill- these accusations keep coming up about Ron. I don't think that Fill is a conservative- he's just a dickhead who drums up trash on everything trying to get a rise out of everyone. In other words- you can't count on him having a consistant viewpoint on anything.

He's as wishy washy as they come- evidence here his attack on the only truely conservative candidate running for president- Ron Paul. Paul is the farthest it gets from being a racist- and if you don't take a few statements he made 20+ years ago out of context- you'll find that they are rooted in freedom of choice- and freedom from government.

Also included in the OP's limited brain capacity- is the ability to consider within reason- the source of most of the attacks on Paul- that they are initiated by the far left- and those who have the most to lose if Paul's limited government ideas ever take hold again like they did in thye 1980's. Ron Paul is as close to a Reagan running for president today- plain and simple.

While Ron's politics are socially liberal- they are fiscally conservative. His policies if adopted would actually help every American - and our economy would benefit by getting government out of every aspect of our lives.

Who hates Ron Paul?
Socialists and communists
Big Government politicians on both sides of the isle
And dickheads with half a brain like the op of this thread!

Merry Christmas!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Dec 2011 21:31 #6 by Kate

BearMtnHIB wrote: <snip out the personal attacks>

He's as wishy washy as they come- evidence here his attack on the only truely conservative candidate running for president- Ron Paul. Paul is the farthest it gets from being a racist- and if you don't take a few statements he made 20+ years ago out of context- you'll find that they are rooted in freedom of choice- and freedom from government.

<snip>

Would you grant President Obama the same leeway? Several conservatives think that sitting in a church for 20 years, listening to a damning preacher, is fair game, but things that Paul actually wrote 20 years ago are not?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Dec 2011 06:21 #7 by Reverend Revelant

BearMtnHIB wrote: Thanks to idiots like Dr. Fill- these accusations keep coming up about Ron. I don't think that Fill is a conservative- he's just a dickhead who drums up trash on everything trying to get a rise out of everyone. In other words- you can't count on him having a consistant viewpoint on anything.

He's as wishy washy as they come- evidence here his attack on the only truely conservative candidate running for president- Ron Paul. Paul is the farthest it gets from being a racist- and if you don't take a few statements he made 20+ years ago out of context- you'll find that they are rooted in freedom of choice- and freedom from government.

Also included in the OP's limited brain capacity- is the ability to consider within reason- the source of most of the attacks on Paul- that they are initiated by the far left- and those who have the most to lose if Paul's limited government ideas ever take hold again like they did in thye 1980's. Ron Paul is as close to a Reagan running for president today- plain and simple.

While Ron's politics are socially liberal- they are fiscally conservative. His policies if adopted would actually help every American - and our economy would benefit by getting government out of every aspect of our lives.

Who hates Ron Paul?
Socialists and communists
Big Government politicians on both sides of the isle
And dickheads with half a brain like the op of this thread!

Merry Christmas!!


Well jerk-strap, first off... I linked to COMPLETE IN CONTEXT COPIES OF HIS NEWSLETTERs... Oh... yea... I know... the newsletters are taken out of context in comparison to his WHOLE LIFE. We have to know everything and anything Ron Paul has done or said in order to understand the context. Bull pucky. And I lived in Texas for 20 years... if you lived there and followed Texas politics in state, at the time, as I did, there was no mystery in regards to his attitude toward black and minorities.

He is not socially liberal. His verbal attacks on gays and blacks are the furthest thing from socially liberal. You wouldn't know a conservative who is socially liberal if one crawled up your ass and camped their. I'M SOCIALLY LIBERAL and fiscally conservative. You prove my point because above you claim that I'm not a conservative. You mean I'm not your narrow-minded-racist-beat-grandmother-with-a-American-flag-if-she-uses-birth-control-there's-nothing-wrong-with-my-moral-compass-I've-got-it-up-my-neighbors-wife's-happy-hole-tebowing kind of conservative.

And you are a real conservative? There is no way you can suggest that you are really conservative if you in any way agree with Ron Paul on his "foreign policy". I have to put that in quotes because in reality he has no policy. If Paul had his way, countries like Iran would be delivering a nuclear bomb right to your front door with a happy "Candygram for Mongo" and a big BOOM.

And you call him the only truly conservative candidate for president? Conservatives don't throw foreign policy in the trash, conservatives don't talk about open borders (oh... did I get that out of context too!), conservatives are not ideologically simpleton libertarians with no policies, no real plan and live in a fantasy world that the future can never realize. Conservatives have their feet on the ground.

You're just pissed off that the whole bunch of GOP candidates are a circle-jerk. I can understand your fear and how you could be fooled into thinking that Ron Paul is your only hope. Compared to the other jerks... at first glance, he appears to be the only candidate that has stayed a steady course for years. Well, you better get your brain back from the pawn shop and start looking into what Ron Paul really represents.

These are not far-left people questioning Ron Paul and his newsletters...

ED MORRISSEY - http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/23/p ... tatements/

ED MORRISSEY - http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/22/p ... wsletters/

Ron Paul - Paul: Bradley Manning is a patriotic hero http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... pbSCT2SE6U

Michael Tomasky - Maybe Ron Paul should give a speech about race http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/20 ... bout-race/

Gingrich hits Ron Paul on the newsletters - http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/20 ... wsletters/


And this is FAR from the first time conservatives have questioned Ron Paul's positions. And I could go on and on... but I don't want to overload your brain. Why don't you get back to me AFTER you've actually read some stuff by other conservative pundits, media sources and try reading the FULL CONTEXT and text of Ron Paul's questionable newsletters.

Hey.. and thanks for the laugh... "Ron Paul is as close to a Reagan running for president today- plain and simple." I agree with the simple part. If you believe that you're certainly stuck on simple.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Dec 2011 06:41 #8 by znovkovic
Howdy Doody will have a tough going IMO? However, Virginia is in a bit of disarray now that "rollie pollie newt" and "rick the pecker perry" don't have enough signatures?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Dec 2011 16:20 #9 by FredHayek
Didnt Paul also predict race riots if President Obama loses his reelection¿ It will be interesting to see if he is right on this one.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Dec 2011 17:25 #10 by Martin Ent Inc
Support your local HA's, SOS, and HPD's.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.150 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+