AspenValley wrote: Is it any wonder that people aren't enthused about The Mitt? I mean, what's with running the Poster Boy for Corporate Raiding and Wallstreet hijinks while we're still fumbling around in the rubble of the Wall Street meltdown?
Actually my issues with Mitt are more for the way he was a liberal governor in Massachussets. I believe he will want to be a popular president more than a conservative president.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
AspenValley wrote: Is it any wonder that people aren't enthused about The Mitt? I mean, what's with running the Poster Boy for Corporate Raiding and Wallstreet hijinks while we're still fumbling around in the rubble of the Wall Street meltdown?
Actually my issues with Mitt are more for the way he was a liberal governor in Massachussets. I believe he will want to be a popular president more than a conservative president.
Maybe you aren't bothered by his out-of-touch "I"m filthy rich and you're just jealous" crap but I'm betting a lot of other people are.
Especially when it comes time to win a general election.
Wrong time and place for a Wall Street/Corporate Raider type.
And I wouldn't agree that his support of certain programs in the past indicate he is a "liberal", just a soul-less SOB who would do and say and support anything he thought would win him a vote. I don't believe this guy stands for ANYTHING other than his own thirst for power. I'd much rather vote for Huckabee or even Sarah Palin than this guy. He's creepy as hell.
AspenValley wrote: Is it any wonder that people aren't enthused about The Mitt? I mean, what's with running the Poster Boy for Corporate Raiding and Wallstreet hijinks while we're still fumbling around in the rubble of the Wall Street meltdown?
Actually my issues with Mitt are more for the way he was a liberal governor in Massachussets. I believe he will want to be a popular president more than a conservative president.
Maybe you aren't bothered by his out-of-touch "I"m filthy rich and you're just jealous" crap but I'm betting a lot of other people are.
Especially when it comes time to win a general election.
Wrong time and place for a Wall Street/Corporate Raider type.
And I wouldn't agree that his support of certain programs in the past indicate he is a "liberal", just a soul-less SOB who would do and say and support anything he thought would win him a vote. I don't believe this guy stands for ANYTHING other than his own thirst for power. I'd much rather vote for Huckabee or even Sarah Palin than this guy. He's creepy as hell.
Wow... that was a bit freaky... for a second I thought you were describing the subject of this thread... Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Was-a-man Schultz.
