One must remember as well that this is a caucus - an informal temperature taking and a selection of delegates to represent the precincts at the state convention, where actual votes are cast to determine the number of delegates representing each candidate for the national convention. This is not a formal vote using the apparatus of the state as primary elections are. There is not even a set ballot used for the caucus statewide - many of the "votes" cast are simply blank pieces of paper upon which a name is inscribed. Talk about trying to make mountains out of mole hills. The political left is so desperate at the moment that they will seize upon anything and use it to create artificial intrigue.
plaidvillain wrote: Well then, how about admitting your topic is misleading propaganda? If you have any character, surely you'll admit your error.
Everyone makes mistakes. I've openly admitted errors in the past and tried to offer corrections...this is your opportunity. Or perhaps you don't care if there's any truth or validity to your posts?...maybe making the fallacious statement is effective enough for you?
You're really one to criticize others' spelling. Get back to me once you understand the differences between than/then; affect/effect; there/their (published writer...whatever).
No jerk... I posted just what I wanted to post, and I posted it with the exact language as I wanted it posted. It was sarcasm, bait for stupid conservatives, bait for the easily outraged progressives. I wanted to see how many of the reactionaries, right and left, that would jump on this one way or another. Evidently you were actually so stupid you found a additional way to make a fool of yourself, a way I wasn't suspecting. Thanks for playing.
