Real voter fraud uncovered

Never again can anyone on 285 Bound say there is no voter fraud.

REGISTER EXCLUSIVE: 2012 GOP caucus count unresolved

There are too many holes in the certified totals from the Iowa caucuses to know for certain who won, but Rick Santorum wound up with a 34-vote advantage.

Results from eight precincts are missing — any of which could hold an advantage for Mitt Romney — and will never be recovered and certified, Republican Party of Iowa officials told The Des Moines Register on Wednesday.

http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2 ... nresolved/

So take that...

If they can screw up an election with less than 100,000 voting, imagine all the screwups in a 50 million person election.

Your linked article makes NO MENTION of voter] fraud, but does point the Iowa GOP folks are incapable of managing their own caucus! Hahahaha! And you want the GOP to run the country!

Mega fail. Still ZERO evidence of widespread voter fraud by anyone, let alone fraud by immigrants that would justify additional voter ID efforts. The GOP ought to do a better job policing their own electiin officials before working on legislation to unfairly restrict seniors, minorities and students from voting.

Shoot, I was hoping that this would be about the voter fraud in pc...

Yeah, New Hampshire was a hoot too... Only ONE confirmed case of fraud in what? 10 years? And that undercover-nazi comes in and single-handedly commits 12 acts of fraud...and rightly gets caught breaking local, state and federal laws.... I think he may be looking at some jail time and fines this time, since he was already on probation from the last failed attempt at fraud.

The GOP couldn't manage a butt-kicking contest.

Oh wait...this must have been satire! Surely the OP wouldn't intentionally mislead...or lie. And the OP is so smart (we know that because he's always telling us so), he couldn't have been mistaken...must have been satire.

Or he rofllol was setting up a Tu Toque (sic) falacy again...

Doesn't sound like voter fraud per NPR, more like the eight precincts electronically delivered their votes, but never sent the physical ones in.

plaidvillain wrote: Oh wait...this must have been satire! Surely the OP wouldn't intentionally mislead...or lie. And the OP is so smart (we know that because he's always telling us so), he couldn't have been mistaken...must have been satire.

Or he rofllol was setting up a Tu Toque (sic) falacy again...

Oh wait...this must have been a worthless reply! Surely Plaidvillain wouldn't intentionally say something clever... or lie. And Plaidvillain is so stupid (we know that because he's always posting worthless tripe like this), he couldn't have been mistaken... it must have been the Aspergers.

And Plaidvillain doesn't even know :rofl how to spell Tu Quoque (he's sick) falacy (sic)... or fallacy...

Well then, how about admitting your topic is misleading propaganda? If you have any character, surely you'll admit your error.

Everyone makes mistakes. I've openly admitted errors in the past and tried to offer corrections...this is your opportunity. Or perhaps you don't care if there's any truth or validity to your posts?...maybe making the fallacious statement is effective enough for you?

You're really one to criticize others' spelling. Get back to me once you understand the differences between than/then; affect/effect; there/their (published writer...whatever).

"Tu Toque" is all yours...you own that one.