LadyJazzer wrote: Like I said... "Unless, of course, you're cynical enough to try to suggest that the guy killed his own cat and traumatized his children to make headlines...."
Leave it to our own PS to be enough of a sick-f*ck to suggest it.
I think this is very probable- liberals will stoop pretty low, and I wouldn't put it past them to do it.
Everybody loves a putty cat- and this smells funny, kinda like the whole "Tawana Brawley" thing.
And LJ- you're not going to deny that the Tawana Brawley" thing happened .... are you?
LadyJazzer wrote: Like I said... "Unless, of course, you're cynical enough to try to suggest that the guy killed his own cat and traumatized his children to make headlines...."
Leave it to our own PS to be enough of a sick-f*ck to suggest it.
Not what PS said. He said there is another possibility....that a person of the left wing did this, in order to help the election chances of the lib due to sympathy, and trying to make the conservatives look like crazy people. Kind of like you LJ....everyone who is a conservative is a crazy right winger.
The fact that it isn't what I said, or even anything resembling what I said for that matter, isn't relevant from LJ's perverted POV. Truth and intellectual honesty are regularly sacrificed by her in the pursuit of creating intrigue to advance her partisan goals.
Two pages and not one right winger here has condemned this action or expressed sympathy for the poor kid who found the cat, or posted that maybe this isn't the best way to say you don't like a candidate......that in itself is pretty telling.
archer wrote: Two pages and not one right winger here has condemned this action or expressed sympathy for the poor kid who found the cat, or posted that maybe this isn't the best way to say you don't like a candidate......that in itself is pretty telling.
Condemn what. There's no proof of who did this. I think it was funny.
LadyJazzer wrote: Conservatives don't need any help to look like crazy people.
LJ, I knew you would be the one to post this. This was horrible but jeez, I just don't think you can use this as an argument that all Republicans are crazy. Remember the girl who carved a B on her face during the election and said she was attacked by black men. She was a liberal who wanted Obama to be elected.
Interesting...except Ashley Todd was a McCain supporter who fabricated the whole incident to blame the Obama campaign. She was NOT a "liberal"...She was a McCain supporter... And yes, Republicans ARE friggin' crazy...
archer wrote: Two pages and not one right winger here has condemned this action or expressed sympathy for the poor kid who found the cat, or posted that maybe this isn't the best way to say you don't like a candidate......that in itself is pretty telling.
Either you missed:
PrintSmith wrote: I agree with you SC, it is way beyond wrong that anyone would be so vicious to a domesticated animal who brings nothing but love into the home.
or you don't consider me to be a right winger - not sure which is the case.
As to the rest of it, I am not yet convinced that the cat was brutalized by a lunatic who was saying that they didn't like that particular candidate instead of by a brutal lunatic who thought flying a false flag might help a candidate they favored achieve a victory. If you wish to believe from the outset that the cat was killed by a lunatic who didn't like the candidate that is certainly within your prerogative, but the evidence available thus far is a far cry from establishing it as an incontrovertible fact despite LJ's partisan attempt to establish it as such.
Your insistence that either the cat owner or someone he worked with might have done this led me to believe your "sympathy" was not particularly sincere. I would be extremely surprised if that were the case. But yeah...you did manage to muster some sympathy...sorry I missed it among the caveats.
Bigotry, and using false accusations to justify it, is an ugly thing archer. There is not a single insistence on my part that Burris or anyone he worked with being possibly linked to the death of his cat. I would be just as surprised as yourself if this proved to be the case. I would not, however, be similarly surprised to find out that such ugly violence was committed by a member of the lunatic left fringe. Lunatics from the left fringe burn down structures at the top of ski runs, spike trees which place the life and limbs of timber workers at risk, destroy property of others and the public, throw red dye onto the clothing of others, endanger human life on the high seas and a host of other things on a fairly regular basis. I would also not be surprised to find out it truly was the act of a lunatic from the right fringe as they too resort to violence. Either is a distinct possibility at this point given the sparsity of the evidence presented. Only the mind of a bigot immediately jumps to blaming the group that they are not a member of and I, unlike some present in this discussion, am not a bigot. That the lunatic who took the life of the cat painted the word "liberal" on the cat's dead body is not conclusive proof that the lunatic was opposed to Burris' candidacy - except, that is, to one who is a bigot. For the bigot, it is all the evidence that is necessary to justify the dark thoughts that exist in their mind about those with whom they disagree.
