- Posts: 15388
- Thank you received: 163
In 2007, when Congress passed legislation that would gradually ban old school incandescent light bulbs, they added a carrot to the pile of sticks: A $10 million dollar prize to encourage the development of a cheap, green, domestic light bulb to replace the dearly departed Edison model.
Five years later, that bulb is coming to a hardware store near you. It will cost you 50 bucks. It also fails to meet many of the original prize specifications. The winner, Dutch electronics company Philips, was the one and only entrant, suggesting that the prize failed to stimulate widespread additional private spending on R&D. The portion of the LED bulb made in America is less than initially envisioned. And the guidelines for pricing were utterly ignored: The goal was $22 price tag in the first year, falling rapidly to $8 by year three
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
CritiKalbILL wrote: 10 Million for the $50 Light Bulbcourtesy of the Tax Payer
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Deflect much fool?Vice Lord wrote:
CritiKalbILL wrote: 10 Million for the $50 Light Bulbcourtesy of the Tax Payer
Is that what Haliburton is charging us for them in Afghanistain now?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The winner, Dutch electronics company Philips, was the one and only entrant, suggesting that the prize failed to stimulate widespread additional private spending on R&D.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
CritiKalbILL wrote:
Deflect much fool?Vice Lord wrote:
CritiKalbILL wrote: 10 Million for the $50 Light Bulbcourtesy of the Tax Payer
Is that what Haliburton is charging us for them in Afghanistain now?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Joe wrote: How can there be a $10 million prize awarded in a contest with only one entrant? LOL. Must be a Gov't contest. I don't care who you are, that there is funny.
The winner, Dutch electronics company Philips, was the one and only entrant, suggesting that the prize failed to stimulate widespread additional private spending on R&D.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I'm all about future "better" technologies...I just don't think the government is very good at picking and promoting the ones that are feasible.Vice Lord wrote:
CritiKalbILL wrote:
Deflect much fool?Vice Lord wrote:
CritiKalbILL wrote: 10 Million for the $50 Light Bulbcourtesy of the Tax Payer
Is that what Haliburton is charging us for them in Afghanistain now?
You'll happily throw billions away on weapons to kill people but freak out when we invest millions in future energy technologies? Get a real problem guys..And worry about the real big money we flush down the toilet everyday of "defense"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.