- Posts: 1548
- Thank you received: 11
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
GOP Rep. Issues Apology for Saying Michelle Obama Has a ‘Big Butt’
The Republican Rep. from Wisconsin who grabbed headlines after he was overheard talking about Michelle Obama’s butt has now issued an apology for the remarks.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner sent the First Lady a personal note saying he was sorry for referring to her backside as a “large posterior” and “big butt,” according to his spokesperson. Politico reports the initial comments were overheard at a D.C.-area airport:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Arlen wrote: You and your source crap. Send everyone off on some menial chore to find sources. You liberals are so dishonest.
I noticed that there were no sources for the fictional name-calling of Mrs. Obama. Go figure.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My goodness, but you are a foulmouthed namecaller. You are definitely not a sweet lady.LadyJazzer wrote: Here's MY source:
[/youtube:2qte0vir]
Fox News Racist Republicans call Michelle Obama a chimp baboon with a fat ass
[youtube:2qte0vir]
GOP Rep. Issues Apology for Saying Michelle Obama Has a ‘Big Butt’
The Republican Rep. from Wisconsin who grabbed headlines after he was overheard talking about Michelle Obama’s butt has now issued an apology for the remarks.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner sent the First Lady a personal note saying he was sorry for referring to her backside as a “large posterior” and “big butt,” according to his spokesperson. Politico reports the initial comments were overheard at a D.C.-area airport:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/gop-rep ... -big-butt/
Where's yours, knuckle-dragger? It's suddenly "dishonest" to tell you to source your accusations or shut up?
In a word, go f**k yourself. (Was that too subtle?)
I think you have the definition of "dishonest" mixed up with the definition of conservative.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I do not know that the lady called a slut by Rush was a direct giver to Obama. Yet he makes the effort to contact her. Yet he makes no effort to contact Palin or call Maher to task. (It figures. He is a liberal.)archer wrote:
Arlen wrote: You and your source crap. Send everyone off on some menial chore to find sources. You liberals are so dishonest.
I noticed that there were no sources for the fictional name-calling of Mrs. Obama. Go figure.
It's only crap Arlen when you don't have a source.....I did do the research and found out the 1 million was donated to a super pac.....since the super pacs and the candidates must be totally separate (we have been hearing from the GOP candidates how they have ABSOLUTELY NO control over their super pacs) then you obviously have no source for Obama getting 1 million from Maher.......you sure get testy when you are proven wrong. Find me a link to Obama directly getting 1 million from Mahar and maybe YOU won't look so dishonest.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Arlen wrote:
I do not know that the lady called a slut by Rush was a direct giver to Obama. Yet he makes the effort to contact her. Yet he makes no effort to contact Palin or call Maher to task. (It figures. He is a liberal.)archer wrote:
Arlen wrote: You and your source crap. Send everyone off on some menial chore to find sources. You liberals are so dishonest.
I noticed that there were no sources for the fictional name-calling of Mrs. Obama. Go figure.
It's only crap Arlen when you don't have a source.....I did do the research and found out the 1 million was donated to a super pac.....since the super pacs and the candidates must be totally separate (we have been hearing from the GOP candidates how they have ABSOLUTELY NO control over their super pacs) then you obviously have no source for Obama getting 1 million from Maher.......you sure get testy when you are proven wrong. Find me a link to Obama directly getting 1 million from Mahar and maybe YOU won't look so dishonest.
I stand by my feelings for the source calling by you. You duck reality by deflecting to the "give me the source" crap.
Are you as mean as your sister, LJ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
archer wrote: For GOP..
1. LJ already addressed the use of the term "teabagger" by tea party members. Go back and read it.
2. No...it was not OK to use the word "c*nt" to refer to Palin That word is never OK. Is mahar not sponsored by his cable channel/the subscribers to that channel. He is getting paid. There was a poster here who called women that word and very few conservatives on this board seemed concerned by it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
for what?The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
archer wrote: For GOP..
1. LJ already addressed the use of the term "teabagger" by tea party members. Go back and read it.
2. No...it was not OK to use the word "c*nt" to refer to Palin That word is never OK. Is mahar not sponsored by his cable channel/the subscribers to that channel. He is getting paid. There was a poster here who called women that word and very few conservatives on this board seemed concerned by it.
Still waiting for your source.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Arlen wrote: My goodness, but you are a foulmouthed namecaller. You are definitely not a sweet lady.
What makes you so mean and ugly to others?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
archer wrote:
for what?The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
archer wrote: For GOP..
1. LJ already addressed the use of the term "teabagger" by tea party members. Go back and read it.
2. No...it was not OK to use the word "c*nt" to refer to Palin That word is never OK. Is mahar not sponsored by his cable channel/the subscribers to that channel. He is getting paid. There was a poster here who called women that word and very few conservatives on this board seemed concerned by it.
Still waiting for your source.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.