The Supremes worked on a interesting case. If you father dies early, the children get Social Security survivor benefits. Seems fair to me.
But what if the woman takes her dead husband's stored sperm to have another child. Should the kid concieved after his father died get the same SS benefits?
The Supremes turned down the mother's request, but it is interesting to see the new moral issues of fertility advancements.
I think the courts have also ruled against women who used their ex-husbands sperm against his will to have more children.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
