Supreme Court ObamaCare

Of course there is no way that Thomas would have leaked info to a tea party lobbyist, i.e., his wife.

Something the Dog Said wrote: Of course there is no way that Thomas would have leaked info to a tea party lobbyist, i.e., his wife.

And you have proof of this?

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Of course there is no way that Thomas would have leaked info to a tea party lobbyist, i.e., his wife.

And you have proof of this?

you betcha!
Ginni Thomas’s 2009 creation of a tea party non-profit group for which she raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in undisclosed contributions, as well as her subsequent creation of a tea party consulting firm last year, has become the basis for allegations by some liberals that her husband’s impartiality has been compromised.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/04 ... z1r7woU5xC
Justice Thomas’s wife Virginia Thomas now a lobbyist

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/02 ... z1r7xPs6gN

and of course inJustice Thomas somehow forgot to disclose her earnings on the required financial disclosures:

Virginia Thomas earned over $680,000 from conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation over five years, a group says. But Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did not include it on financial disclosure forms.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/22 ... e-20110122

But of course he is totally impartial

If your spouse was a Supreme. Would you want to know?

FredHayek wrote: If your spouse was a Supreme. Would you want to know?

It is not the disclosure, as that probably is not that improper, it is that Thomas is getting hundreds of thousands of dollars from those who oppose the law.

So therefore all Supremes who are married and their spouses engage in any kind of political activity should recuse themselves? Let's just insist that they not be married. And that they not have any friends with any political persuasions who might unduly influence them. In fact let's require they remain as monks in a monastery without any outside contact because obviously they can't make independent decisions.

And let's give them an exemption for their spouses to earn $680,000 without reporting it! Hey, that's a great idea!

Something the Dog Said wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Of course there is no way that Thomas would have leaked info to a tea party lobbyist, i.e., his wife.

And you have proof of this?

you betcha!
Ginni Thomas’s 2009 creation of a tea party non-profit group for which she raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in undisclosed contributions, as well as her subsequent creation of a tea party consulting firm last year, has become the basis for allegations by some liberals that her husband’s impartiality has been compromised.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/04 ... z1r7woU5xC
Justice Thomas’s wife Virginia Thomas now a lobbyist

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/02 ... z1r7xPs6gN

and of course inJustice Thomas somehow forgot to disclose her earnings on the required financial disclosures:

Virginia Thomas earned over $680,000 from conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation over five years, a group says. But Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did not include it on financial disclosure forms.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/22 ... e-20110122

But of course he is totally impartial

I'm still waiting for your proof that he tipped the Obamacare decision to his wife. I didn't think so. You don't have squat.

LadyJazzer wrote: Do you think that Scalia, Thomas, Alito leaked their decisions to the Teabaggers before the case was even heard?

Yes, it will be interesting.

If the Ginsburg 4 can make their collectivist minds up before arguments are heard why would you object to other justices doing the same?

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Of course there is no way that Thomas would have leaked info to a tea party lobbyist, i.e., his wife.

And you have proof of this?

you betcha!
Ginni Thomas’s 2009 creation of a tea party non-profit group for which she raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in undisclosed contributions, as well as her subsequent creation of a tea party consulting firm last year, has become the basis for allegations by some liberals that her husband’s impartiality has been compromised.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/04 ... z1r7woU5xC
Justice Thomas’s wife Virginia Thomas now a lobbyist

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/02 ... z1r7xPs6gN

and of course inJustice Thomas somehow forgot to disclose her earnings on the required financial disclosures:

Virginia Thomas earned over $680,000 from conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation over five years, a group says. But Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did not include it on financial disclosure forms.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/22 ... e-20110122

But of course he is totally impartial

I'm still waiting for your proof that he tipped the Obamacare decision to his wife. I didn't think so. You don't have squat.

Where did I claim that he tipped the decision to his wife?