Walking Eagle

President BARACK OBAMA was invited to address a major gathering of the American Indian Nation in upstate New York .

He spoke for almost an hour about his plans for increasing every Native American's present standard of living.

He referred to his time as a U.S. Senator and how he had voted for every Native American issue that came to the floor of the Senate.

Although President Obama was vague about the details of his plans, he seemed most enthusiastic and spoke eloquently about his ideas for helping his "red sisters and brothers."

At the conclusion of his speech, the Tribes presented Obama with a plaque inscribed with his new Indian name, "Walking Eagle."

The proud President then departed in his motorcade to a fundraiser, waving to the crowds.

A news reporter later asked the group of chiefs how they came to select the new name they had given to the President.

They explained that "Walking Eagle" is the name given to a bird so full of crap it can no longer fly.

Seriously, Otis, you should change your name to "Walking Eagle." This story has been around for a long, long time.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/eagle.asp

If one person believes it and votes against Obama, it was worth it according to Toad.

I believe.

Snopes is always biased.

Ps I am part NA and the walking eagle name is so inspired as to what the chiefs siad.

Soulshiner wrote: If one person believes it and votes against Obama, it was worth it according to Toad.

The only objective I care about in the election is getting Obama out of the White House. His supporters are so heavily indoctrinated in his message that they can't sort the truth from a lie and have difficulty distinguishing a joke from a serious post. So in their eyes I may as well be saying "If one person believes it and votes against Obama, it was worth it ."
Why should I bother debating with anyone who refuses to use logic and do it from an objective point of view? It just wastes everyone's time and no one will change their mind, even if the truth jumps up off the ground and zaps them on the posterior.

otisptoadwater wrote:

Soulshiner wrote: If one person believes it and votes against Obama, it was worth it according to Toad.

The only objective I care about in the election is getting Obama out of the White House. His supporters are so heavily indoctrinated in his message that they can't sort the truth from a lie and have difficulty distinguishing a joke from a serious post. So in their eyes I may as well be saying "If one person believes it and votes against Obama, it was worth it ."
Why should I bother debating with anyone who refuses to use logic and do it from an objective point of view? It just wastes everyone's time and no one will change their mind, even if the truth jumps up off the ground and zaps them on the posterior.

The logic of spreading a lie?

I heard that Michelle said she would like to walk out of the WH and keep on walking,,, lets make her wish come true.