Injured vet’s guns stolen by D.C.

15 May 2012 15:52 #1 by Grady

After being injured on his second tour of duty in Afghanistan, Lt. Augustine Kim spent the night in a D.C. jail for possessing unregistered guns.

Mr. Kim was transporting his firearms from his parents’ house in New Jersey to South Carolina when he stopped at Walter Reed in Washington for a medical appointment in the summer of 2010.

After being pulled over, handcuffed, arrested, thrown in jail overnight, his guns were confiscated by the city.

In the end, the platoon leader felt forced to plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge, which was later dismissed, but the District still refuses to return to him $10,000 worth of firearms and parts. The national guardsman will deploy to Kosovo this summer. The city should return his property before he leaves to serve our nation overseas for the third time.

Read more here at the Washington Times

If it can happen to a Vet at our nation's capitol it can happen anywhere.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 May 2012 15:55 #2 by LadyJazzer
Gee, another phony subject line...What a surprise...

But then, I knew that "stolen" meant "confiscated by law enforcement" before I opened the thread...

Some things are soooo predictable....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 May 2012 15:57 #3 by FredHayek
I hope the police take a lot of public heat over their idiot move.

But I also think the vet was stupid to bring firearms into DC. He should have sent them to himself instead.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 May 2012 16:08 #4 by Grady

LadyJazzer wrote: Gee, another phony subject line...What a surprise...

But then, I knew that "stolen" meant "confiscated by law enforcement" before I opened the thread...

Some things are soooo predictable....

that they are.

The words of the attorney

This is legalized theft,” Mr. Gardiner said. “The charges were dropped, and they don't give you your property back? The Constitution requires that if the government takes your property, it has to do something to keep it.

. I also took the headline straight from the article quoted.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 May 2012 16:13 #5 by LadyJazzer
Yes, I'm sure you did....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.135 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+