Top Obama Donor Tied to Bain Layoffs

FredHayek wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: Creating jobs is not the object of the exercise. It's creating wealth for the investors, and if jobs get created or lost, that's incidental. And we know how well that wealth trickled-down....

Better than high tax countries like France?

And what would you prefer as a job, one where you are just opening a door, or one where you are creating value for the customer, the firm, and advancing yourself.

Doesn't have anything to do with what I wrote...But as a regurgitated talking-point, I'd give it a '1' ....

LadyJazzer wrote:

FredHayek wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: Creating jobs is not the object of the exercise. It's creating wealth for the investors, and if jobs get created or lost, that's incidental. And we know how well that wealth trickled-down....

Better than high tax countries like France?

And what would you prefer as a job, one where you are just opening a door, or one where you are creating value for the customer, the firm, and advancing yourself.

Doesn't have anything to do with what I wrote...But as a regurgitated talking-point, I'd give it a '1' ....

High income tax countries like France have double the unemployment rate of even Obama's America. My cousin bought a medical furniture company there and has regretted it. Too much government control. And her experience explains why they have so many companies unwilling to expand operations there and hire more French. But you stick with your idea that increased regulation and taxes won't increase unemployment

How in the world does Obama manage to zip his pants with LJ and archer attached to him like suckerfish?

This is simply a case of the misguided rich trying to atone for their sins, to bad they bet on the wrong horse.

otisptoadwater wrote: This is simply a case of the misguided rich trying to atone for their sins, to bad they bet on the wrong horse.

I think it is more likely that this donor knows more about Romney than the rest of us and realizes Romney would be disastrous for America

archer wrote:

otisptoadwater wrote: This is simply a case of the misguided rich trying to atone for their sins, to bad they bet on the wrong horse.

I think it is more likely that this donor knows more about Romney than the rest of us and realizes Romney would be disastrous for America

Your think? That's worse than speculation... you're making a statement in the form of a speculation then defying anyone to prove it false. It's quite obvious that the lefties here are so desperate to smear Romney that you will post any ridiculous garbage they think up. Looks like the conservatives aren't the only ones who think Obama will lose.

Back at you archer.

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

archer wrote:

otisptoadwater wrote: This is simply a case of the misguided rich trying to atone for their sins, to bad they bet on the wrong horse.

I think it is more likely that this donor knows more about Romney than the rest of us and realizes Romney would be disastrous for America

Your think? That's worse than speculation... you're making a statement in the form of a speculation then defying anyone to prove it false. It's quite obvious that the lefties here are so desperate to smear Romney that you will post any ridiculous garbage they think up. Looks like the conservatives aren't the only ones who think Obama will lose.

Back at you archer.

You and Bill.....you don't have one original thought between you. All you can do is parrot liberals, and not very well either. Pretty pathetic. And it's YOU think, not your think.

archer wrote: You and Bill.....you don't have one original thought between you. All you can do is parrot liberals, and not very well either. Pretty pathetic. And it's YOU think, not your think.

Parrot? No... I throw your hypocrisy back into your face. Those were your own words (with slight modifications). On one thread you are bitch slapping everyone with your "it's speculation" mantra, and then you come over to this thread and do the same thing... speculate. It really doesn't matter if I couldn't come up with another single comment of my own. You liberals are such hypocrites, I could spend years simply clipping and pasting your own words and throwing them back at you.

Stay on your feet Archer... it's 5 1/2 months to the elections.... lot's of time for you to make a fool of yourself. "I can help" (said with a slow southern drawl and a big sh*tty grin on my face).

Nothing funnier to wake up to this morning than the hypocrite-in-chief of 285bound accusing someone else of being a hypocrite. We can all have a good laugh over that one.

archer wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

archer wrote:

otisptoadwater wrote: This is simply a case of the misguided rich trying to atone for their sins, to bad they bet on the wrong horse.

I think it is more likely that this donor knows more about Romney than the rest of us and realizes Romney would be disastrous for America

Your think? That's worse than speculation... you're making a statement in the form of a speculation then defying anyone to prove it false. It's quite obvious that the lefties here are so desperate to smear Romney that you will post any ridiculous garbage they think up. Looks like the conservatives aren't the only ones who think Obama will lose.

Back at you archer.

You and Bill.....you don't have one original thought between you. All you can do is parrot liberals, and not very well either. Pretty pathetic. And it's YOU think, not your think.

I parroted you ONE time to prove a point that your statement would be true by switching the Rs and Ds. That's hardly some sort of trend. (unless you can show other evidence which YOU CAN"T).

Lets get in a real debate sometime without you making blanket statements about what you think consevatives are collectively thinking.....I'll challenge you to try it anytime. But just like LJ, I doubt you are capable.