Top Obama Donor Tied to Bain Layoffs

23 May 2012 07:59 #21 by Something the Dog Said
and as usual, much ado about absolutely nothing:

UPDATE: Alex Stanton, a spokesperson for Bain Capitol, does not dispute that Lavine was on the board of Ampad, but insists that he had nothing to do with the workers being laid off in Marion, Indiana.
“Jonathan Lavine was not at Bain Capital when Ampad was acquired by the firm, and was not involved on the investment during the challenging situation at the Marion plant. The assertion he had any involvement with those events is totally false,” said Stanton in a statement.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... n-layoffs/

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 May 2012 08:16 #22 by archer

CritiKalbILL wrote: I parroted you ONE time to prove a point that your statement would be true by switching the Rs and Ds. That's hardly some sort of trend. (unless you can show other evidence which YOU CAN"T).

Lets get in a real debate sometime without you making blanket statements about what you think consevatives are collectively thinking.....I'll challenge you to try it anytime. But just like LJ, I doubt you are capable.

You pull out the "let's have a real debate" bit every time you get caught posting something stupid. I used to think you meant it. Not anymore. After your last similar offer your highroad looked more like the gutter.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 May 2012 08:36 #23 by Reverend Revelant

archer wrote:

CritiKalbILL wrote: I parroted you ONE time to prove a point that your statement would be true by switching the Rs and Ds. That's hardly some sort of trend. (unless you can show other evidence which YOU CAN"T).

Lets get in a real debate sometime without you making blanket statements about what you think consevatives are collectively thinking.....I'll challenge you to try it anytime. But just like LJ, I doubt you are capable.

You pull out the "let's have a real debate" bit every time you get caught posting something stupid. I used to think you meant it. Not anymore. After your last similar offer your highroad looked more like the gutter.


SImple version... She doesn't have the ability to debate you. rofllol

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 May 2012 08:41 #24 by Rick

archer wrote:

CritiKalbILL wrote: I parroted you ONE time to prove a point that your statement would be true by switching the Rs and Ds. That's hardly some sort of trend. (unless you can show other evidence which YOU CAN"T).

Lets get in a real debate sometime without you making blanket statements about what you think consevatives are collectively thinking.....I'll challenge you to try it anytime. But just like LJ, I doubt you are capable.

You pull out the "let's have a real debate" bit every time you get caught posting something stupid. I used to think you meant it. Not anymore. After your last similar offer your highroad looked more like the gutter.

The offer stands if you ever want to try it, I won't be nice if you won't.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.161 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+