LadyJazzer wrote: Edwards was/is a slime-bag. I won't defend him... But obviously the evidence wasn't there. May he rot in whatever hell he's created for himself. But if the government wants to convict, they'd better have a better handle on the laws and the evidence next time.
He was one of the best Democrat candidates for President that ever ran for the office.
archer wrote: I'm not surprised you would think so. The conservatives do seem to gravitate to the scoundrels and the sleaze balls.
By the way Archer. The other day, in a thread about Obama's economic progress (or lack of progress) you stated "The FACT is.....I am better off today than I was the day before Obama took office. What about that don't you understand?"
So... can you explain what Obama policy/policies have enabled you to be "better off today than I was the day before Obama took office?"
LadyJazzer wrote: Edwards was/is a slime-bag. I won't defend him... But obviously the evidence wasn't there. May he rot in whatever hell he's created for himself. But if the government wants to convict, they'd better have a better handle on the laws and the evidence next time.
Personally I didn't follow the case that close, but I think the prosecuters didn't do a very good job here. You could be right, maybe the evidence wasn't there.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
