ID Required

by Mike Flynn

In recent years, Democrats have argued that requiring voters to show photo IDs prior to voting is an egregious act of voter suppression. Ben Jealous, of the NAACP, has gone so far as to argue that such requirements are tantamount to modern-day Jim Crow laws. In the world they inhabit, lots of voters don't have access to photo IDs, so requiring voters to provide this will "disenfranchise" them and leave them out of the democratic process. Funny they don't feel that way for their own party conventions.

On Saturday, Massachusetts delegates will meet in their state's Democrat party convention. The votes of these delegates will determine whether there are primary elections for their party nominations. With so much at stake, Democrats have decided to implement Voter ID requirements: http://www.massdems.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/C2C-To-upload1.pdf

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/01/voter-id-ma-democrats-disenfranchise-their-delegates

So the link to the story is from Breitbart so it's obviously a lie... But wait, have a look at the ink to the .pdf . It's the 2012 Massachusetts Democratic Party Delegate Guide, I'll even save you the searching through all of the nauseating adds from the delegates - have a close look at the top of page 14. Here is what the first three lines of paged 14 say:

[center:22orupn0]"Registration and Credentials
A PHOTO ID WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER
THE MASSMUTUAL CENTER" [/center:22orupn0]

Here my suggestion for the new logo for the Massachusetts Democratic Party:

Great post!

Maybe the Walker failure will motivate lefties to think this issue over again? I'm sure that the next round of news will have to do with how Republicans manipulated the WI election and fraudulently preserved Mr. Walker's position as 'Gubner of the state of Wizzkhanson. Hail Cheezeheads!