Walker and GOP big bucks bought Wisconsin recall election

Ryt_Rick wrote:

Raees wrote:

Nobody that matters wrote:

Raees wrote: What happened to all the "they're busing in voters" and "dead people are voting" rhetoric on here from election night? When Walker won, it all magically disappeared.

When you beat someone in spite of their cheating, there's no reason to point out the cheating.

Or, there's no reason to making up stuff about the election anymore once you've won. Was there ever ANY evidence that voters were bused in from out of state or that dead people voted?

I would think there would be enough panic on the part of WI Dems, that if there was some sort of cheating going on, then the Dems would find it.

And to the point some are attempting to make about the election being bought by the right, those people should blame thhe president and the DNC for the lack of help. President Obama's campaign pulled in about 60 million last month and nothing was put into the critical WI election. I think the administration knows they made a big mistake but just don't want to admit a strategic failure.

Wouldn't the money raised by Obama be for re-electing Obama? How could he then take that money to defeat Walker.....some donors might be angry. Where conservative logic falls apart is in thinking that a win for Walker will translate into a win for Romney......I don't think so, and apparently neither does Obama.

archer wrote:

Ryt_Rick wrote:

Raees wrote:

Nobody that matters wrote:

Raees wrote: What happened to all the "they're busing in voters" and "dead people are voting" rhetoric on here from election night? When Walker won, it all magically disappeared.

When you beat someone in spite of their cheating, there's no reason to point out the cheating.

Or, there's no reason to making up stuff about the election anymore once you've won. Was there ever ANY evidence that voters were bused in from out of state or that dead people voted?

I would think there would be enough panic on the part of WI Dems, that if there was some sort of cheating going on, then the Dems would find it.

And to the point some are attempting to make about the election being bought by the right, those people should blame thhe president and the DNC for the lack of help. President Obama's campaign pulled in about 60 million last month and nothing was put into the critical WI election. I think the administration knows they made a big mistake but just don't want to admit a strategic failure.

Wouldn't the money raised by Obama be for re-electing Obama? How could he then take that money to defeat Walker.....some donors might be angry. Where conservative logic falls apart is in thinking that a win for Walker will translate into a win for Romney......I don't think so, and apparently neither does Obama.

Oh, this conservative has no such thoughts. I know Obama is a ruthless Chicago politician. He won't go down without a fight, even if he doesn't deserve another month, much less another 4 yrs.

If I had to bet, I'd say he wins again...and then we're in deep trouble. We may still be if Romney wins, but we know we are with Obama. Even the libs here have nothing to say about him. All you do is attack Romney.

RenegadeCJ wrote: [ Even the libs here have nothing to say about him. All you do is attack Romney.

Apparently, none of the Cons have anything nice to say about ME either, other than "anyone-but-Obama"... All they do is attack Obama... Hmmmm... Pot/Kettle/Black

Democracy4Sale wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote: [ Even the libs here have nothing to say about him. All you do is attack Romney.

Apparently, none of the Cons have anything nice to say about ME either, other than "anyone-but-Obama"... All they do is attack Obama... Hmmmm... Pot/Kettle/Black

Obama is a known commodity. We know he has no leadership qualities, and has no idea how to help the economy.

Romney is a unknown as prez. We know he can't be worse, and I believe his leadership abilities will get us going in the right direction.

I don't know anyone who actually thinks Obama has done even an ok job. If he were a republican, the democrats would do all they could to get him out of office due to his complete ineptness at leadership.

Thanks for admitting that you have nothing nice to say about Romney other than he is not-Obama... Once again, you prove my point.

Things can always get worse...elect Romney and you will see how bad things can get. Maybe not right away...kinda like Bush....it took 8 years for the economy to bottom out under his leadership and to realize we were in 2 unwinable wars...I only hope the American people don't have as short a memory as the Republicans think they do.

archer wrote: Things can always get worse...elect Romney and you will see how bad things can get. Maybe not right away...kinda like Bush....it took 8 years for the economy to bottom out under his leadership and to realize we were in 2 unwinable wars...I only hope the American people don't have as short a memory as the Republicans think they do.

Oh I don't know if people will be thinking about Bush at all next election. I believe they will be thinking about the promises THIS president made. People remember where the downturn started after 9/11 and they should also know that the housing/credit crisis was a long time in the making. We can argue about whether or not the wars should have been fought, but there were plenty of top Dems beating the war drum too.

This election will be about this current economy, and if it keeps going down, voters won't blame Bush unless they are ultra left imo.

archer wrote: Things can always get worse...elect Romney and you will see how bad things can get. Maybe not right away...kinda like Bush....it took 8 years for the economy to bottom out under his leadership and to realize we were in 2 unwinable wars...I only hope the American people don't have as short a memory as the Republicans think they do.

Why, yes. RNC press secretary Alexandra Franceschi recently shared that, as she sees it, the 2012 agenda for the party is not distinct from those under Bush/Cheney, simply a new version. “I think it’s that program,” she said in an interview, “just updated.”

[youtube:2h6z8fvv][/youtube:2h6z8fvv]

We know how WELL that worked...

But I'm excited!...If I can just convince the Amercian people that 4 more years of failed Bush policies is better, well then, me and the Cadillacs, and the dog on the roof and the car elevators are IN!! :thumbsup:

RenegadeCJ wrote: Romney is a unknown as prez.

This attitude is what almost got us Veep Sarah Palin. After seeing how she almost imploded before the election, the unknown card is a big negative. After the Republican Machine tried to slide her past everyone, I highly question their judgement on who they put forth for election for the White House.

Soulshiner wrote: I highly question their judgement on who they put forth for election for the White House.

Sounds like you're talking about the Democrats.
You're still hung up on Palin as a VP candidate, yet the Democrats gave us a President who was never a governor, never a mayor, never ran a company, never served in the military, never really did much of anything. His lack of experience has been dreadfully apparent as he continues to look absolutely clueless when it comes to leading a country.