Supreme Court Says NO to SEIU

21 Jun 2012 12:11 #1 by Rick

"When a public-sector union imposes a special assessment or dues increase, the union must provide a fresh ... notice and may not exact any funds from nonmembers without their affirmative consent," Alito said.

Seems reasonable to me :thumbsup: :)

Anyone disagree?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06 ... -fee-hike/

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jun 2012 12:35 #2 by FredHayek
The Supremes, per Yahoo, also came down on the networks claiming the decency rules are too vague. Opening the door for more profanity and nudity?

But back on topic, makes sense to me, tell me before you raise rates.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

21 Jun 2012 18:49 #3 by PrintSmith
My favorite line from the majority opinion:

In any event, even a full refund would not undue the First Amendment violations, since the First Amendment does not permit a union to extract a loan from unwilling nonmembers even if the money is later paid back in full.

I dunno folks - it's beginning to look like the union is catching on to the public sector union scams that have been operating unfettered for the last few decades. First the cradle of the "progressive" movement retains a governor who took away collective bargaining for wages and benefits, then California, another island of conservative principles, sees two cities make changes to public union pensions for new hires, and now no less than the Supreme Court issues its own smackdown. I'm beginning to think there is hope for our union after all . . . . . .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.139 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+