A day after killing Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman passed a police lie detector test when asked if he confronted the teenager and whether he feared for his life “when you shot the guy,” according to documents released today by Florida prosecutors.
According to a “confidential report” prepared by the Sanford Police Department, Zimmerman, 28, willingly submitted to a computer voice stress analyzer (CVSA) “truth verification” on February 27. Investigators concluded that he “has told substantially the complete truth in regards to this examination.”
Maybe the corrupted Obama FBI agents should water board him until they get the answer they want.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
How about granting Zimmerman bond and then having a band of liberal radicals lynch him? Would that satisfy you LJ? Let's skip over the law when there is enough outrage and no proof. That makes sense...
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
Democracy4Sale wrote: Too bad he and his wive also got busted for perjury, and he's back in jail. That should play really well to a jury.
Oh, and the Police Chief who was on temporary suspension has been permanently fired.
Yep, I'm glad that one "stress test" is going to counteract all of the negative stuff he has going against him.
His wife's activities can not even be offered as some sort of evidence at his trial. So it's not going to play at all. And the status of the police chief has nothing to do with the evidence, once again, not admissible. And since you don't have access to all the information that the defense is going to bring to the table, you don't know what is going to counteract what. You're not an attorney or an expert in law I'm assuming or else you wouldn't be making the sort of statements you are making?
otisptoadwater wrote: How about granting Zimmerman bond and then having a band of liberal radicals lynch him? Would that satisfy you LJ? Let's skip over the law when there is enough outrage and no proof. That makes sense...
She would probably be on the fence... unless his white half had been to a Tea Party rally, then she would celebrate his death.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
All I ever said was I wanted him arrested and to stand trial... I'm still waiting for that trial to happen.
You obviously have your FauxNews-implanted idea of what the outcome should be, and keep posting little "info from the Rightie-Front" tidbits; and I have an opinion, but I'm still waiting for the trial.
The fact that he and his wife perjured themselves is a fact; the firing of the police chief is a fact; that he passed a "voice stress test" is an "ALLEGED" fact from a “confidential report”, which apparently has not been made public yet.
I'm still waiting for the trial. But you rave on... You seem to need it.
Democracy4Sale wrote: All I ever said was I wanted him arrested and to stand trial... I'm still waiting for that trial to happen.
You obviously have your FauxNews-implanted idea of what the outcome should be, and keep posting little "info from the Rightie-Front" tidbits; and I have an opinion, but I'm still waiting for the trial.
The fact that he and his wife perjured themselves is a fact; the firing of the police chief is a fact; that he passed a "voice stress test" is an "ALLEGED" fact from a “confidential report”, which apparently has not been made public yet.
I'm still waiting for the trial. But you rave on... You seem to need it.
Facts that can't be introduced in the trail because they are not related to the incident that happened that night. End of story.
otisptoadwater wrote: How about granting Zimmerman bond and then having a band of liberal radicals lynch him? Would that satisfy you LJ? Let's skip over the law when there is enough outrage and no proof. That makes sense...
She would probably be on the fence... unless his white half had been to a Tea Party rally, then she would celebrate his death.
At this point Zimmerman may as well "have an accident" in jail rather than allowing the due process of law to take its course (as it should according to the law, but who's worried about legal issues and following the law?!). Get Barry to exclaim Executive Privilege and hang him! Why bother with due process when there is so much outrage? Hang Zimmerman from the nearest tree; Democrats can refer to their KKK manuals for instructions on how to do that.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
