- Posts: 2915
- Thank you received: 3
Topic Author
Read more here at Forbes.comObama Supports U.N. Treaty That Redistributes Drilling Revenues
A proposed Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), which is supported by President Obama but has not yet been ratified by Congress, will subordinate U.S. naval and drilling operations beyond 200 miles of our coast to a newly established U.N. bureaucracy. If approved, it will grant a Kingston, Jamaica-based International Seabed Authority (ISA) the power to regulate deep-sea oil exploration, seabed mining, and fishing rights.
As part of the deal, as much as 7% of U.S. government revenue that is collected from oil and gas companies operating off our coast will be forked over to ISA for redistribution to poorer, landlocked countries. This apparently is in penance for America’s audacity in perpetuating prosperity yielded by our Industrial Revolution.
The treaty was originally drafted in 1968 at the behest of Soviet bloc and Third World dictators interested in implementing a scheme to weaken U.S. power and transferring wealth from industrialized countries to the developing world. It had been co-authored by Elisabeth Mann Borgese
Given good prospects that the White House and Senate may have fewer Democrat residents after November, Senator Kerry has been working hard to speed up the approval process before moving vans arrive. Republican Senator Luger, another strong treaty supporter and career globalist, apparently didn’t want to highlight that fact during the course of his hard-fought Indiana reelection campaign. Now, with nothing more to lose following his primary defeat, he can be expected to help push for Senate ratification as early as next month.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Republican Senator Luger, another strong treaty supporter and career globalist, apparently didn’t want to highlight that fact during the course of his hard-fought Indiana reelection campaign. Now, with nothing more to lose following his primary defeat, he can be expected to help push for Senate ratification as early as next month.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Raees wrote: I found this part interesting:
Republican Senator Luger, another strong treaty supporter and career globalist, apparently didn’t want to highlight that fact during the course of his hard-fought Indiana reelection campaign. Now, with nothing more to lose following his primary defeat, he can be expected to help push for Senate ratification as early as next month.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Democracy4Sale wrote: Yes, they get to actually vote their conscience instead of listening to extremist party ideologues.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Grady wrote:
Read more here at Forbes.comObama Supports U.N. Treaty That Redistributes Drilling Revenues
A proposed Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), which is supported by President Obama but has not yet been ratified by Congress, will subordinate U.S. naval and drilling operations beyond 200 miles of our coast to a newly established U.N. bureaucracy. If approved, it will grant a Kingston, Jamaica-based International Seabed Authority (ISA) the power to regulate deep-sea oil exploration, seabed mining, and fishing rights.
As part of the deal, as much as 7% of U.S. government revenue that is collected from oil and gas companies operating off our coast will be forked over to ISA for redistribution to poorer, landlocked countries. This apparently is in penance for America’s audacity in perpetuating prosperity yielded by our Industrial Revolution.
The treaty was originally drafted in 1968 at the behest of Soviet bloc and Third World dictators interested in implementing a scheme to weaken U.S. power and transferring wealth from industrialized countries to the developing world. It had been co-authored by Elisabeth Mann Borgese
Given good prospects that the White House and Senate may have fewer Democrat residents after November, Senator Kerry has been working hard to speed up the approval process before moving vans arrive. Republican Senator Luger, another strong treaty supporter and career globalist, apparently didn’t want to highlight that fact during the course of his hard-fought Indiana reelection campaign. Now, with nothing more to lose following his primary defeat, he can be expected to help push for Senate ratification as early as next month.
or here at the LA Times
Sounds like a good treaty if you are a one world government supporter.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_21 ... sea-treatyInfluential business leaders have testified that expanding the definition of the outer continental shelf, which the treaty allows, would significantly increase the potential scope of U.S. domestic energy production. For example, American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Jack Gerard said, "It would secure an additional 4.1 million square miles (of ocean floor) under U.S. jurisdiction."
The U.S. needs to act quickly to allow American companies to compete with foreign firms, added Kerry, because "they want and need certainty in order to invest the billions of dollars required to develop the extended shelf, especially in the Arctic, where the Chinese and Russians are already laying claims."
U.S. Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Thomas Donohue testified that the benefits of ratification outweigh any criticism, as the treaty is "critical to America's global leadership." He added, "The U.S. has more than any country to gain or to lose. The treaty is not perfect. It'll be changed like all treaties are, but we had better be sitting at the table."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.