Look up the stats people 94% Romney negative ads, 89% for Obama...they are equally ridiculous. Bash Obama all you want, but don't tell me Romney is any better....he isn't. Sorry i can't do your research for you,but we're on the road and I'm working on a cell phone.
archer wrote: Look up the stats people 94% Romney negative ads, 89% for Obama...they are equally ridiculous. Bash Obama all you want, but don't tell me Romney is any better....he isn't. Sorry i can't do your research for you,but we're on the road and I'm working on a cell phone.
I couldn't care less about their ads.
From the few specifics that have come out (and some generalities), I think Romney will do less damage to the economy than Obama has and will continue to do.
Both are scumbag self-serving politicians.
"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln
archer wrote: Look up the stats people 94% Romney negative ads, 89% for Obama...they are equally ridiculous. Bash Obama all you want, but don't tell me Romney is any better....he isn't. Sorry i can't do your research for you,but we're on the road and I'm working on a cell phone.
Its well known Archer, that I do not like either one of them, on the bright side, you are doing pretty damn good working off a cell phone
Interesting that PS and other's decry the attacks from the left on Mitt, yet when asked in a previous thread to provide positive reasons to vote for Mitt, not a single one was offered. Instead we get negative attacks ad nauseum on President Obama by the dozens every day here. Yet the conservatives are crying victim when the flaws of Mitt are exposed.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
archer wrote: Look up the stats people 94% Romney negative ads, 89% for Obama...they are equally ridiculous. Bash Obama all you want, but don't tell me Romney is any better....he isn't. Sorry i can't do your research for you,but we're on the road and I'm working on a cell phone.
Campaign ads or ones from 501C groups?
Anyway, ads are pretty useless to me. Pretty much soundbites.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
navycpo7 wrote:
Its well known Archer, that I do not like either one of them, on the bright side, you are doing pretty damn good working off a cell phone
Thanks...my new Razr Maxx....we've been on the road for a couple weeks and it has done everything I would normally do on a laptop. But doing research and posting at the same time is a real nuisance
Something the Dog Said wrote: Interesting that PS and other's decry the attacks from the left on Mitt, yet when asked in a previous thread to provide positive reasons to vote for Mitt, not a single one was offered. Instead we get negative attacks ad nauseum on President Obama by the dozens every day here. Yet the conservatives are crying victim when the flaws of Mitt are exposed.
Go back and look again. I posted nothing negative about Obama, and several reasons I'll vote for Romney. Your blanket statement is false.
"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln
Something the Dog Said wrote: Interesting that PS and other's decry the attacks from the left on Mitt, yet when asked in a previous thread to provide positive reasons to vote for Mitt, not a single one was offered. Instead we get negative attacks ad nauseum on President Obama by the dozens every day here. Yet the conservatives are crying victim when the flaws of Mitt are exposed.
While your at it... show me how Romney was implicated in this "boss-of-son"scam?
Something the Dog Said wrote: Interesting that PS and other's decry the attacks from the left on Mitt, yet when asked in a previous thread to provide positive reasons to vote for Mitt, not a single one was offered. Instead we get negative attacks ad nauseum on President Obama by the dozens every day here. Yet the conservatives are crying victim when the flaws of Mitt are exposed.
While your at it... show me how Romney was implicated in this "boss-of-son"scam?
That's what I was wondering too, if Romney was 'implicated', why is nobody covering this breaking news except for LJ? Seems like this would be a huge story on every network.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Something the Dog Said wrote: Interesting that PS and other's decry the attacks from the left on Mitt, yet when asked in a previous thread to provide positive reasons to vote for Mitt, not a single one was offered. Instead we get negative attacks ad nauseum on President Obama by the dozens every day here. Yet the conservatives are crying victim when the flaws of Mitt are exposed.
While your at it... show me how Romney was implicated in this "boss-of-son"scam?
That's what I was wondering too, if Romney was 'implicated', why is nobody covering this breaking news except for LJ? Seems like this would be a huge story on every network.
Give her a break. LJ got her talking points email from Huffington... she doesn't have the smarts to make this up all on her own.
