Raees wrote:
To follow Grady's analogy: We all drive cars and trucks. How safe do you think it would be on Highway 285 if some of us drove stock cars with souped up engines and dragsters mixed in and decided our own speed limit?
To continue that analogy....
You are correct. Hwy 285 is full of stock cars, and a bunch that aren't. Just because the vehicle (gun) is capable of more doesn't mean the owner uses it that way. Would you like rev limiter's on all cars that automatically limited the vehicle to whatever the speed limit is?
Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!
There are plenty of "regular hunting rifles" that are semi-automatic, one trigger pull one bullet down range, just like the AR-15 types. They just don't look as scary.
That was the point of the picture, while the 2 cars or rifles in this case look different they are exactly the same under the hood.
An atom bomb is an armament. Weapons and ammunition; armaments: "they were subjugated by force of arms". Military weapons and equipment: "chemical weapons and other unconventional armaments".
Do you think you should be allowed to own one under the Second Amendment?
Raees wrote: To answer the question put to me, a rifle you have to chamber the next bullet into -- not something modified to fire 100 rounds with 100 consecutive trigger pulls. That's an assault rifle. Assault rifles are made for nothing other to kill many people in a short amount of time.
I know it's not your description, but it's mine.
I agree...And I'm not interested in the wild off-the-wall irrelevant analogies either.