It Worked

Democracy4Sale wrote: Really? You have a source for Obama using phony actors from a stock-photo library? By all means, post it.

How about some phoney white doctor's coats to let us all know these people are 'real' doctors?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a616a623970c-600wi
This reallly was a classic BS show. My guess is that they also arranged these folks in a rainbow of races and genders.

Ryt_Rick wrote:

Democracy4Sale wrote: Really? You have a source for Obama using phony actors from a stock-photo library? By all means, post it.

How about some phoney white doctor's coats to let us all know these people are 'real' doctors?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a616a623970c-600wi
This reallly was a classic BS show. My guess is that they also arranged these folks in a rainbow of races and genders.

Classic! But LJ will either deny or divert. Good for a laugh though! lol

I didn't ask you for a picture...I asked you for a SOURCE...which, of course, you refuse to provide...

But thanks for playing.

LOL, The SOURCE when provided is refused to be seen by your blind eyes LJ.

Translation: If I give it, it will be another joke.... -OR- "I don't have one other than some nutjob email from one of the usual right-wing sources."

Got it.

Here's the back story from 2009:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/i ... bxCC0TNZHN

Ryt_Rick wrote: This reallly was a classic BS show. My guess is that they also arranged these folks in a rainbow of races and genders.

Yeah, cause everybody knows real doctors are all white males.

otisptoadwater wrote: And your link to your empirical evidence is? Otherwise you are just doing what you always do, being a contrarian without anything factual to back your claim. In visual terms most of your replies look like this to me.

At least Hippo poo is good for the environment, I'll blame the increase in greenhouse gasses on you.

I forgot, you are a fox news viewer.

People were asked questions about news habits and current events in a statewide poll of 600 New Jersey residents recently. Results showed that viewers of Sunday morning news shows were the most informed about current events, while Fox News viewers were the least informed. In fact, FDU poll results showed they were even less informed than those who say they don’t watch any news at all.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2 ... -suggests/

There probably is a small group of media consumers out there somewhere in the world who are more misinformed, overall, than Fox News viewers. But if you only consider mainstream U.S. television news outlets with major audiences (e.g., numbering in the millions), it really is true that Fox viewers are the most misled based on all the available evidence—especially in areas of political controversy. This will come as little surprise to liberals, perhaps, but the evidence for it—evidence in Stewart’s favor—is pretty overwhelming.

http://www.alternet.org/story/154875/th ... isinformed



Poor Toad, no wonder you are incapable of having an intelligent discussion or even defend your posts, you simply watch Fox News.

Sexually Transmitted DiseaseS mouth still running. Guess you are from New Jersey?

Who watches only one news show?

If I counted on NBC Nightly News or other to give an unbiased report, it ain't gonna happen.

Raees wrote:

Ryt_Rick wrote: This reallly was a classic BS show. My guess is that they also arranged these folks in a rainbow of races and genders.

Yeah, cause everybody knows real doctors are all white males.

I would have thought someone with your type of experience would have better reading comprehension. I said nothing about doctors being all white males now did I? I said it was "my guess" that the people were arranged (or staged).