Moderators here favor a hateful liberal

What?! Does Democracy4sale have the right to personally attack other with vulgarity and not have it answered with a much less vulgar challenge?
Are you playing favorites by splitting off the thread anytime that I post and Democracy4sale bitches about it?

Come on! Do not support this hate poster and her vile posts.

Arlen wrote: What?! Does Democracy4sale have the right to personally attack other with vulgarity and not have it answered with a much less vulgar challenge?
Are you playing favorites by splitting off the thread anytime that I post and Democracy4sale bitches about it?

Come on! Do not support this hate poster and her vile posts.

Sorry Arlen, it is with heavy heart that you are the first person I am bestowing a yapping dog award to.

[youtube:32l1f2i3][/youtube:32l1f2i3]

Let her continue her personal attacks. Just shows how the Left refuses to engage in civil debate. One more example? VL. Besides I don't need a moderator to protect me.

Here are just a few quotes of her's before I posted in the thread:

You clowns have nothing but insanity.

......the wacko gun-nuts here

You can't make this bullsh*t up... (I wonder what Democracy4sale meant by "bullsh*t". It is SO obscured by the *)

God, we are so lucky to have you as the shining light of what vigilante-ism should be.

I'm SOOO unimpressed by this "I have a CCW and I know what *I'D* do..." Monday-Morning Quarterbacking./.Let's see who can p*ss the highest up the tree...

Spare me your territory-marking testosterone fest....

Oooo...You're sooo tough.... I'm soooo impressed with your tough-guy thing!... Your helmet is sooooo big.... (Is this a sexual reference? You bet it is!)

Keep your yapping dog award. There are bitches here that need it a lot worse than I do.

Here is my post that got it sent to the Ring

OK, Democracy4sale, what are the chances of the shooter continuing to shoot if no one is armed? 100%?
What are the chances of the police stopping the shooter before he quits shooting? 0%?

You are happy with those odds? You are such a wimp that you would accept your child's fate and think that "all is well with this situation" if your child was killed? You would not lift a finger? You would let one of your children be murdered in such a manner and think that all is wonderful in the world because we are helpless?

I believe that you are happy with the helpless situation of the victims because you do not give a rat's patoot about any of them. If you cared you would wish for the victims to be able to defend themselves from a killer.

Whatsa matter Arlen, LJ has emasculated you? Put on your big boy pants and deal with it.

Something the Dog Said, it says more about ScienceChick than anyone else.

I would rather be called names than have a poster accuse me of not caring about the victims of a tragedy or imply that I don't care about my own child, as Arlen has accused LJ of feeling.....that is pure hate, and certainly belongs in the ring. If you had accused me of not caring what happens to my own child I would have made LJ's post look tame by comparison.

Now, do you want some cheese with that whine?

archer wrote: I would rather be called names than have a poster accuse me of not caring about the victims of a tragedy or imply that I don't care about my own child, as Arlen has accused LJ of feeling.....that is pure hate, and certainly belongs in the ring. If you had accused me of not caring what happens to my own child I would have made LJ's post look tame by comparison.

Now, do you want some cheese with that whine?

She has not displayed any care for anyone since I have been on this board for the past year. It seems to be a very ingrained trait in her. Why would I suspect anything else?

Do you want some toilet tissue with your post?

I think it was the word "patoot" that got it sent to The Ring. I could be wrong.