All of which may be true... But some empty suit running for president, with no clue about how to handle himself in the foreign policy arena should not be the one giving them the bad news.
So do a couple of other countries. It was a stupid answer; it's NOT the "right answer" until the concerned parties SAY it's "the right answer." And he proved, once again, that he's an idiot and not ready-for-prime-time.
Kearney gave the RIGHT answer, based on the subtleties of foreign policy. Subtlety is not a word you use with Mitt-the-Twit.
Mitt give the dumb answer that shows he is not read-for-prime-time as a Commander-in-Chief and president. But, yep, I'll bet the Jewish donors loved it.
Top CEOs donate to Romney over Obama by 4-1 margin
My friends in Germany and the Czech republic support Romney as the better of 2 evils they say.
At first they thought Obama might be a motivator and driven to make things happen. But they say he is no better than the former leaders as he is full of empty promises, and lies.
Not sure why they are so interested in our politics.
Martin Ent Inc wrote: Top CEOs donate to Romney over Obama by 4-1 margin
Wow...Really? Imagine my surprise...
I guess if you're a 1%-er, and you want "free stuff" (tax breaks, less regulation to pollute, ability to hide your money, screw your employees, etc.) then Mitt-the-Twit is your man.