Republicans vs. Women

31 Jul 2012 10:50 #1 by Raees
Republicans vs. Women was created by Raees
Even with a persistent gender gap in a presidential election year, House Republicans have not given up on their campaign to narrow access to birth control, abortion care and lifesaving cancer screenings. Far from it.

A new Republican spending proposal revives some of the more extreme attacks on women’s health and freedom that were blocked by the Senate earlier in this Congress. The resurrection is part of an alarming national crusade that goes beyond abortion rights and strikes broadly at women’s health in general.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opini ... women.html

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Jul 2012 11:04 #2 by Reverend Revelant

Raees wrote: Even with a persistent gender gap in a presidential election year, House Republicans have not given up on their campaign to narrow access to birth control, abortion care and lifesaving cancer screenings. Far from it.

A new Republican spending proposal revives some of the more extreme attacks on women’s health and freedom that were blocked by the Senate earlier in this Congress. The resurrection is part of an alarming national crusade that goes beyond abortion rights and strikes broadly at women’s health in general.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opini ... women.html


I wonder why?

House Democratic leaders have resolved the abortion dispute that stood in the way of passing health-care reform, and now appear poised to approve the legislation late Sunday.

As part of the agreement, the White House announced that President Obama would issue an executive order on abortion after the House approves the health-care bill assuring that no federal funds would be used to subsidize the procedure. That was enough to secure the support of a group of Catholic Democrats who represent the swing votes on the legislation.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), the leader the anti-abortion holdouts, said he and others in the group can now support a far-reaching health-care package, apparently giving Democrats the votes needed to pass the bill later tonight.

According to White House spokesman Dan Pfeiffer, the executive order will provide "additional safeguards to ensure the status quo is upheld and enforced, and that the health-care legislation's restrictions against the public funding of abortions cannot be circumvented."

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/201 ... cutiv.html


Sure.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Jul 2012 11:11 #3 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic Republicans vs. Women
So Health Care Reform gets passed. Neat.

Oh wait. Your link is from 2010. Two years ago.

Relevance today? Zero.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Jul 2012 11:14 #4 by Reverend Revelant

Raees wrote: So Health Care Reform gets passed. Neat.

Oh wait. Your link is from 2010. Two years ago.

Relevance today? Zero.


History does not erase lies. It's been over 60 years and I still remember the Holocaust.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

31 Jul 2012 11:19 #5 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic Republicans vs. Women
And I still remember Watergate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+