Will be opening Friday in Denver. I know at the Westminster Promenade possibly other places. It is a look at Obama the man, the look the press in 2008 refused to show you.
I am planning to see it opening night with a few people. Dare a Dem to actually see a new opinion.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I'm sure the Democrats will discount it as a misrepresentation of Barry and his past no matter how many facts are presented in the movie; I would rather that this film be labeled as a documentary but that distinction would be lost on Barry's devote followers.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
“I’m not trying to bash Obama in a crude way,” Dinesh D’Souza says in a TV news clip featured in the conservative writer and commentator’s new documentary “2016: Obama’s America.” It’s a comment recycled from one of D’Souza’s many media appearances in defense of his well-known, earlier attacks on the president, both in a controversial 2010 Forbes magazine cover story and two subsequent books, on which this film is based.
One thing can be said for “2016.” It’s anything but crude. The best infomercials rarely are.
And, make no mistake, D’Souza’s documentary profile of President Obama -- which is like his earlier writing attempts to portray its subject as not just anti-capitalist but anti-American -- is just that: a slick infomercial. As these things go, the movie seems destined to irritate the president’s supporters while mobilizing his detractors, even as it is doomed to win precious few converts. It’s a textbook example of preaching to the choir.
D’Souza makes it all sound almost plausible, but only if you’re predisposed to believe that Obama hates America. It’s bashing, all right, but with a velvet-gloved fist.
So the killing of Bin Laden movie gets put on the back burner till after the election because the conservatives squealed about showing it before the election, but this hit piece gets to be seen now?
archer wrote: So the killing of Bin Laden movie gets put on the back burner till after the election because the conservatives squealed about showing it before the election, but this hit piece gets to be seen now?
It is in limited distribution and won't sway many voters. A want to limit free speech?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.