2016 The Movie

Raees wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Can you please explain to me how he could have gone down to the airport in Hawaii to see his daddy off to Harvard at two and a half years of age when we know that he and his mother weren't even living on the island at that point?

Since the father left his wife and 2-year-old son in Hawaii to go to Harvard and they didn't move to Indonesia until he was six, where do you THINK Obama was living at the time his father left Hawaii?

The same State he'd been living in since he was about 3 weeks old - Washington. Ann Dunham left Hawaii shortly after young Barack's birth and didn't return to the island after heading for Washington to attend college until Obama the elder had left the island for Harvard. It is one of the 38 "notables" (ie lies) that have been identified in the story Obama tried to pawn off as his autobiography.

Darn that guy. He got where he was living when he was 2 wrong. He must be trying to hide something.

I'm also wondering about that oft-repeated birther claim that he registered at Occidental as foreign student when his high school transcripts were from Hawaii? Any idea, oh wise one?

PrintSmith wrote:

archer wrote: No surprise there......the right has been trying to define Obama with lies since he first declared himself a candidate for president. No matter how many times their lies have been exposed, they just keep repeating them. It has been effective, their conservative base believes every thing they are told, no questions asked.

As opposed to the lies Obama has told about himself in his "autobiography" to try and convince you that he is something other than what he is? Can you please explain to me how he could have gone down to the airport in Hawaii to see his daddy off to Harvard at two and a half years of age when we know that he and his mother weren't even living on the island at that point? Would you care to opine on the reasons for the rewrite of his author's bio downplaying the accomplishments of his parents? How about that claim that he never heard his pastor of 20 years saying anything like G** d*** America? Did you swallow that one down whole as well? I think you've got the wrong group of folks believing what they were told with no questions asked, regardless of how many times what they are told has been, and continues to be, revised. Given that Obama has deemed it appropriate to refer people to the Sermon on the Mount with regards to his policies, perhaps those that support him should refer to it themselves, specifically Matthew 7:3-5. No need to look it up - it deals with smotes and beams in eyes.

Speaking of which, PS, why do you not apply this wisdom to yourself. Your post is so full of lies and distortions that it is laughable. For example, you imply that Rev. Wright said God Damn America in every sermon, when the only report of his saying that was in a 2003 sermon for which you have no evidence that President Obama was in attendance. Further, you have no evidence that President Obama lied about never hearing Rev. Warren make such a statement. Further you leave out the context for the remark by Rev. Wright. So who is the liar here? Hmm?

Pack it in Dog - it isn't me claiming that only one side swallows what they are fed without questioning the source of the information. Thus the reference to smotes and beams. To even attempt to claim that the one sermon referenced would be the sole instance of anything similar being spoken from the pulpit over the course of the 20+ years that Obama sat in the pews of that church is laughable on its face. Regardless of whether or not Obama lied about hearing that one speech is irrelevant to the larger issue of the tenor and tone of the man who was his spiritual adviser for 20 years, the man who Obama credited with his Christian faith, the man who officiated at his wedding. Wright preached liberation theology Dog and the particular sermon which included the G** d*** America is wholly consistent with that ideology, as are Obama's actions and policies.

PrintSmith wrote: Pack it in Dog - it isn't me claiming that only one side swallows what they are fed without questioning the source of the information. Thus the reference to smotes and beams. To even attempt to claim that the one sermon referenced would be the sole instance of anything similar being spoken from the pulpit over the course of the 20+ years that Obama sat in the pews of that church is laughable on its face. Regardless of whether or not Obama lied about hearing that one speech is irrelevant to the larger issue of the tenor and tone of the man who was his spiritual adviser for 20 years, the man who Obama credited with his Christian faith, the man who officiated at his wedding. Wright preached liberation theology Dog and the particular sermon which included the G** d*** America is wholly consistent with that ideology, as are Obama's actions and policies.

You should look at that verse more closely, particularly the last section.

Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye

It most definitely applies here. You spread lies through innuendo and speculation without a single fact to back them up. You claim that President Obama lied about not hearing the single sermon by Rev. Wright condemning the actions of the government in their unjust treatment of black males with colorful language. You now claim that Rev. Wright repeated similar language over the years without a single factual back up. You condemn President Obama on singular remarks made by Rev. Wright. Do you really want to go there? Let's talk about the actions and words of the Catholic church in regard to pedophiles. Let's talk about the centuries of hatred and discrimination and bigotry of the Catholic church.

so you need to the first cast out the beam of thine own eye before you continue to spread your lies and innuendo. At least have the decency to provide a factual basis for your lies.

2016 The Move Fact Check

http://seattletimes.com/html/entertainm ... =head_more

I'm sure Michael Moore had much the same motives. In the end, they're both preaching to the choir.

Raees wrote: I'm sure Michael Moore had much the same motives. In the end, they're both preaching to the choir.

The choir is getting bigger.

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/anti-obama ... 58566.html

The film does make a good rally point and hopefully inspires more people to write checks to Mitt.