Which primary do you think is the most vicious? I was thinking Norton V. buck, but Romanoff V. Bennett is also pretty brutal. Maes isn't having to do much versus McInnis because Scott is shooting off his own foot.
Fun to watch these bitter, scheming people in action.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
look into the mcinnis issue a bit deeper - would this issue of ever come out if ali hasan was still in the treasures race? All this started over scott not endorsing ali hasan - politics....hmm
Nothing like watching the Republicans snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Hopefully we won't have Hickenlooper as governor and Bennet or Romanoff as Senator. I really don't like Norton, too much RINO in her same goes for McInnis.
In regards to Norton v Buck, the only nasty one I have seen thus far is Norton. Buck seems to be keeping his activities limited to why you should vote for him instead of why you shouldn't vote for his opponent. I, for one, prefer this type of a campaign.
And the primaries don't got nuthin' on what we're going to see once the final card for the election has been decided. Though most are at least somewhat reticent to launch into pitbull mode against a member of their own party, neither side seems to have much restraint when it is a member of the other party.
fordgirl wrote: look into the mcinnis issue a bit deeper - would this issue of ever come out if ali hasan was still in the treasures race? All this started over scott not endorsing ali hasan - politics....hmm
Regardless of why it came out, I'm glad it's out. I'm tired of politicians thinking they're royalty and can lie, plagiarize, etc., increasing our taxes as they go. No moral compass.
