Clinton Ties Honey Boo Boo TV ratings?

That's what Fox News reported. Of course it wasn't true.

OH NO!! The oasis of liberal 'facts' says the same thing!! rofllol

You need to work on your google skills before you step in more poop

:woo hoo:

'Honey Boo Boo' Ratings Match Bill Clinton DNC Speech

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/0 ... 64145.html

The story you linked to says Honey Boo Boo tied CNN, that's all. It's in the second sentence. Perhaps you didn't read that far. Clinton was on more than CNN. He got 50.2 million eyeballs (25.1 million viewers).

Perhaps you should work on your reading skills before you step in more poop. :woo hoo:

It was a clash of titans, and Bill Clinton won.

Wednesday night's prime-time coverage of the Democratic National Convention, which featured a fiery and finger-pointing address by former President Bill Clinton, attracted 25.1 million viewers, according to ratings giant Nielsen. The Democrats out-muscled the season opener of NFL football on NBC, which drew 23.9 million viewers. The Dallas Cowboys defeated the New York Giants on the field.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/en ... 3510.story

You're welcome.

Don't you think the Huffpo headline is misleading as well?

Sure do. Par for the course.

And speaking of misleading, I'll play the "they do it too" game so many of you on the left love to play. This IS much worse but nobody on your side every mentioned it. Only Fox pointed this out:

[youtube:1pjeihnn][/youtube:1pjeihnn]

Fox pointing out a cable network lying. That's rich.

Raees wrote: Fox pointing out a cable network lying. That's rich.

They all do it, if it's not an outright lie, it's an omission of news that should be reported but isn't because it might hurt their left wing agenda. It is comical how people on the left go so ballistic over the ONLY right leaning network... as if they should all lean left.

I think you misunderstand the outrage on the left.

Fox (which has more viewers than the other cable networks combined) does this while claiming they are "Fair and Balanced." If they'd just admit they're biased, I don't think there would be the outrage.

What is sad to me that Fox News is proof that being biased is good for the corporation's bottom line, so I don't see any change on the horizon. If anything, it's only going to get worse. I'm surprised the Tea Party hasn't come up with a new network to outfox Fox (be even more to the right).

Any ideas on why Fox News on cable is so popular but why it's not on the Internet and why CNN is not on TV but is on the Internet? (CNN has twice as many Internet viewers as Fox does)


Top 10 Global News Brands for May 2012 (U.S., Total)
Rank Brand Unique Audience Time per Person (hh:mm:ss)
1 Yahoo!-ABC News Websites 62,101,000 0:17:56
2 CNN Digital Network 39,559,000 0:35:27
3 HPMG News Websites 33,534,000 0:16:17
4 MSNBC Digital Network 30,175,000 0:15:03
5 NYTimes.com 29,248,000 0:19:16
6 HuffingtonPost 29,016,000 0:20:46
7 Tribune Newspapers
22,479,000 0:07:58
8 Fox News Digital Network 21,555,000 0:34:36
9 Today 15,960,000 0:08:52
10 USAToday.com 15,104,000 0:08:50
Read as: During May 2012, 62 million Americans visited Yahoo!-ABC News Websites.