"Required vegetables now on Seattle Schools' lunch curriculum
As part of the first changes to school-lunch rules in 15 years, schools in Seattle and across the nation now must ensure that students put a half-cup of fruit or vegetables on their trays. Students don't have to eat the food, but the hope is that they will.
"...............
"Students don't have to actually eat the required food — a fact that has raised concerns that a lot of it may end up in the garbage. As one Florida school nutrition official told Education Week, a newsweekly: "We don't want healthy trash cans.""......................
At least putting the minimum daily recommended amount out is a big step forward. My kids now have to take a fruit AND a vegetable every day and I'm happy about that b/c I know they're likely to eat it since I've raised them on healthy well-balanced diets (and it's not unusual for them to choose the entree salad for their meal). No, you can't make kids eat it, but if you couple it with education from the parents about the merits of eating healthy (and if they themselves provide a god example by not eating at McDonald's every other day), then it'll work. Obesity isn't just a problem for each individual, it's a terrible financial burden on our health care system (even before national health care). If we reduced what we spent treating chronic diseases, it helps us all - healthier people work more days and hours and GDP goes up, etc.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Science Chic wrote: You can lead a horse to water...
At least putting the minimum daily recommended amount out is a big step forward. My kids now have to take a fruit AND a vegetable every day and I'm happy about that b/c I know they're likely to eat it since I've raised them on healthy well-balanced diets.
Who can argue with that? Heck, who wouldn't applaud that.
Do we need to discuss the difference between you doing it and the gov. mandating it?
lol You need both - mandates help because they set the guidelines, which can't be based only on common sense (cuz too many people don't have none [yes, I'm purposely using my gooder Eeenglish here]), but require research data to back them up. Schools, other institutions, and parents have to implement them or the effort is useless.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Blazer Bob wrote: Do we need to discuss the difference between you doing it and the gov. mandating it?
"The 'government'?...You mean the Seattle School District? Wow, who knew that the "gubm't" had done become the Seattle School District...
So, if the local school district decides it wants to experiment with an idea that might get kids to eat healthier, that's a gubm't mandate of some sort? And how do you KNOW that they AREN'T combining it with some form of nutritional information to the kids to encourage them to eat smarter? You got a link for that?
Science Chic wrote: lol You need both - mandates help because they set the guidelines, which can't be based only on common sense (cuz too many people don't have none [yes, I'm purposely using my gooder Eeenglish here]), but require research data to back them up. Schools, other institutions, and parents have to implement them or the effort is useless.
Guess I am confused on the difference between mandates and guidelines. When I was eight years old a mandate was something required and a guideline was, well a guideline.
When I was eight I had to eat my vegetables before I could get up from the table. I could be wrong but I do not think my mom needed a government mandate or guideline to make that rule.
We could make it illegal for anyone to have a child with out passing a test and getting a license. I think any scientist could make that case. Would you want to live there? Would you want your kids to live there?
Sorry, that's my bad. You're right that a mandate is required, whereas a guideline is not. I had in the back of my head that if it's not law, then even a mandate is really a guideline so I went searching for the exact definition of "mandate" to confirm - it turns out a court can issue a mandate, and an electorate can "mandate" a representative to do something, but it looks like a mandate from a non-judicial government branch is called a law, but a law isn't necessarily a mandate? (if I'm reading it right, it's fuzzy word semantics). So these food "mandates" would be guidelines, if they haven't officially been made law. I think.
Parents are absolute authoritarians, no democracy or vote required, so no mandate necessary. lol it's also law that they buckle up their kids in the car, but that's broken every day too. Just because it exists doesn't mean it's followed, even if it is in the best interest of the child. Parents make bad decisions for their kids all the time, but no I wouldn't want to live in a world where it was necessary to pass a test in order to get permission to have a child; although I see the merits in the arguments for it (philosophy class in college was one of my faves!). The problem is that it would become a slippery slope all too quickly. Number 18 indeed - I grok that.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
In a perfect world we wouldn't need mandates or guidelines for schools to provide healthy lunches to children and for those children to actually eat them. But life isn't perfect.....many schools are more interested in providing the easy lunch, packaged and simple to fix foods rather than fresh veggies, fruit, and nutritious selections. many children do not have perfect parents who would provide good examples and encourage healthy choices. I am mostly against any dictating of peoples choices, except in those instances where it can affect the health of our children, especially those who have lax parents through no fault of their own. If schools can encourage those kids to eat healthier and make better choices then that is a positive thing.
Science Chic wrote: Parents make bad decisions for their kids all the time, but no I wouldn't want to live in a world where it was necessary to pass a test in order to get permission to have a child; although I see the merits in the arguments for it (philosophy class in college was one of my faves!). The problem is that it would become a slippery slope all too quickly. Number 18 indeed - I grok that.
I can see the merits also. If we had a bigger pool of saints to vote for, I would not only support it, I would fight for it. I do grok that. Alas, I know few saints.
Trust your children, my grandchildren's lives to the whims of the elected aristocracy or give them a chance in a free society.
Their lives can be a cradle to grave life of security swaddled in Obama's America. How did that work for Socrates? Or they can be allowed to strive to reach their limits.