When are you FOOLS going to wake-up?
The unions had they're propose, and did a good thing, NOW ONLY the BILLIONAIRE leaders of the unions, (may even call them the 1%), just cause HIGHER prices for all, and disdurpt productivity, kill motavation, and class welfare. Where are the FRICK'in Unions in Detroit, Chicago, (Etc.) shouldn't they be demanding that the government to start new factories, so they're union brothers & sisters could have jobs?
Nope, they're living with the 1%, that pay (or get around paying the highest tax rate), I don't get it it makes NO sense. Why should anybody strive to be RICH, when the government will just take MORE, & MORE, & MORE of the money they worked for?
The conclusion among Our Elite was that Romney’s statements were a campaign-ending calamity — because that was a foregone conclusion for them.
It’s fine to criticize Romney’s views; that’s how a debate of substance takes place. It’s also fine to question the timing of his statement (though that’s a question of strategy and tactics, not substance).
This was something different. This was an effort — not entirely conscious — to make it illegitimate for Romney to criticize the president’s foreign policy at a moment when foreign policy has suddenly taken center stage.
But that’s exactly when such a debate should take place — because it’s when the public will actually pay attention.
That is not what The Most High want — a debate. What they want is for Obama to be re-elected. And they’ll use the tools at their disposal to achieve their aim.
Apparently the horror of Romney’s evil words was lost on Obama. In a CBS interview yesterday, he converted the business into a one-liner: “Gov. Romney seems to have a tendency to shoot first and aim later.”
How solemn. How grave.
So it appears one politician can say what he likes and the other can’t. Because, you know, there’s an election to win, and the self-appointed referees are also the fans.
IT'S A HOME RUN!!!!!!
This guy nailed it. I realize the Administration and its lapdog press corps really doesn't want to talk foreign policy at the moment. All I can wish for is that the topic comes up during the debates so we can hear about it then. If Mr. Romney doesn't have a field day with this....
I would say this better summarizes what's been going on in the media the past few days:
The broader criticism of Obama
regarding treatment of allies and adversaries is unfounded*, and so are the specific attacks that Romney and his allies have been making for years.
<snip>
As it happened, the criticism this week wasn’t just inaccurate, but also thoroughly dishonest. In addition to all of that, there was the display of spectacularly poor judgment in immediately attacking on Tuesday night. Romney had made false claims before (“abandoning” missile defense, “betraying” allies, etc.), but he had not attempted to make political hay out of an ongoing crisis before now. When he did, his habit of saying untrue and unfounded things about Obama’s foreign policy record came back to bite him. Considering how long he has been able to make misleading and dishonest accusations on these issues before now, it is about time.
The bolding is mine. The source is The American Conservative (that leftie, pinko rag).
appleannie wrote: I would say this better summarizes what's been going on in the media the past few days:
The broader criticism of Obama
regarding treatment of allies and adversaries is unfounded*, and so are the specific attacks that Romney and his allies have been making for years.
<snip>
As it happened, the criticism this week wasn’t just inaccurate, but also thoroughly dishonest. In addition to all of that, there was the display of spectacularly poor judgment in immediately attacking on Tuesday night. Romney had made false claims before (“abandoning” missile defense, “betraying” allies, etc.), but he had not attempted to make political hay out of an ongoing crisis before now. When he did, his habit of saying untrue and unfounded things about Obama’s foreign policy record came back to bite him. Considering how long he has been able to make misleading and dishonest accusations on these issues before now, it is about time.
The bolding is mine. The source is The American Conservative (that leftie, pinko rag).
"The air of inconstancy about Romney grew again Friday after he did an interview on “Good Morning America.” The candidate again took up the issue of Libya and seemingly embraced the very position — a sharp critique of an anti-Muslim video — that he had blasted just 48 hours earlier as an apologia to extremists.
But the Republican presidential nominee is learning today in foreign affairs — as he has learned for weeks on the domestic ledger — that you can’t be just another choice, you have to be a better choice."
:thumbsup: 
