Report: The US Moving Warships to the Libyan Coast

The Associated Press
Created: 09/12/2012 04:56:28 PM PDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- U.S. officials say the Pentagon is moving two warships to the Libyan coast, in the aftermath of the attack in Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador and three others.

Officials say one destroyer, the USS Laboon, moved to a position off the coast Wednesday, and the USS McFaul is en route and should be stationed off the coast within days.

http://www.times-standard.com/breakingnews/ci_21528651/ap-report-u-s-officials-say-2-warships

Good for him. This scenario could end up being the opposition's worst nightmare leading up to the election.

So war is a good thing and your are ok with having to go back to Libya to rescue it from it's own citizens after Barry forced regeim change? No worries about how much that is going to cost or the obvious connections to al Qaeda? What about the unrest in Cario? Should the US devote even more resources to suppress the riots there? Spend, spend and spend some more - that's what you believe in? At some point the well is going to run dry and America is closer to that point than you might think.

Raees wrote: Good for him. This scenario could end up being the opposition's worst nightmare leading up to the election.

:faint: You should set your sights a little higher. Perhaps a small nuc would guarantee his reelection. At least it is something for you to hope for.

otisptoadwater wrote: So war is a good thing and your are ok with having to go back to Libya to rescue it from it's own citizens after Barry forced regeim change? No worries about how much that is going to cost or the obvious connections to al Qaeda? What about the unrest in Cario? Should the US devote even more resources to suppress the riots there? Spend, spend and spend some more - that's what you believe in? At some point the well is going to run dry and America is closer to that point than you might think.

Why are you suddenly so interested in what I think? I do know the warships ordered to station off Libya have cruise missiles.

I do you know ANYTHING he does, you'll find fault with.

If McCain had been elected we'd ALREADY be in Syria. A least there's that.

otisptoadwater wrote: So war is a good thing and your are ok with having to go back to Libya to rescue it from it's own citizens after Barry forced regeim change? No worries about how much that is going to cost or the obvious connections to al Qaeda? What about the unrest in Cario? Should the US devote even more resources to suppress the riots there? Spend, spend and spend some more - that's what you believe in? At some point the well is going to run dry and America is closer to that point than you might think.

Oh, Lordy. I figured Jim was right but didn't expect to see it quite so fast...

Today, the President pledged to bring those responsible for the attacks to justice.

"We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

Given Obama’s track record, justice will very likely be done indeed.

Justice is likely to fall on the attackers from the sky, delivered via drone or at the hand of US Special Forces – at which point, of course, Conservatives will have some other complaint about how Obama isn’t focused on the economy or some such thing. Also, Nazis.

Obamabots on the march, "He" can do no wrong, bow down and hand over your wealth. Only the Gubment knows what is best for you and the Motherland.

IMHO, stirring the pot in the Middle East is a recipe for disaster especially when considering The Messiah's cozy relationship with Israel, Iran's defiance of the IAEA, and continued instability in Iraq. Laugh and play in the sun, enjoy the unicorn farts and rainbows, it's all good until the excrement hits the fan.

[center:d5xbr5x4] [/center:d5xbr5x4]