Neil Armstrtong.

13 Sep 2012 08:56 #1 by CinnamonGirl
Neil Armstrtong. was created by CinnamonGirl
They are having a memorial service for Neil today. It got me thinking about alot of things. First, he was one of those guys that had amazing words and quotes for everything. He will be buried at sea. They say he was always in charge of his own destiny. And he thought walking on the moon was the least interesting part of flying to the moon. He said, "pilots love to fly, not walk."

So here is what I was thinking about, with the Russians and a common goal, we would not have walked on the moon. The competition of the space race is what made it happen. Competition makes everyone better.

Now I don't want this to turn into a nasty political thread but seriously. That is what I believe in for the economy.

It takes a special person to do something no one else has done and especially as dangerous as that mission was.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Armstrong

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 10:18 #2 by ScienceChic
Replied by ScienceChic on topic Neil Armstrtong.
I had a friend who posted just yesterday on Facebook this message:

What was the last thing we did as a nation that was big? I mean like fly to the moon or something of that nature. Think about it, we still power our vehicles on fossil fuels. We don't use electric power fueled by nuclear rods. Our infrastructure is becoming unsustainable (power grid, roads and the like). It seems that the attitude of our nation has went from let's figure it out to we can't do that to that can't be done. Just thinking out loud which could be really dangerous.

This was my response:
Putting Curiosity safely on Mars??? It may seem ho-hum, but it was a big deal technologically speaking! Curiosity Lands On Mars: 10 Amazing Facts

And if you didn't watch the video of the NASA scientists and engineers as it was touching down, do it. You'll feel a sense of pride and joy as if you were watching the space shuttle take off or the Apollo movie all over again! Touchdown is at 2:37 in this video and when the first image comes back at 4:45, they cheer and celebrate all over again. This is the kind of thing that makes me feel pride in my country, but you know what - it wasn't just a USA effort alone - Curiosity cost $2.5 billion dollars. Any space venture from here on out really has to be a multi-nation effort because 1.) we can't afford to do it ourselves and 2.) space belongs to the entire human race, not just one country.
[youtube:3dd0g3mn]
[/youtube:3dd0g3mn]

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 10:20 #3 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic Neil Armstrtong.

Science Chic wrote: Curiosity cost $2.5 billion dollars.


Or about the same as we spend in two weeks in Afghanistan ($3.6 billion per month).

Meanwhile China is pressing ahead with a manned moon mission. Perhaps they'll have the sense to stay and establish a research station.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 12:17 #4 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Neil Armstrtong.

Science Chic wrote: I had a friend who posted just yesterday on Facebook this message:

What was the last thing we did as a nation that was big? I mean like fly to the moon or something of that nature. Think about it, we still power our vehicles on fossil fuels. We don't use electric power fueled by nuclear rods. Our infrastructure is becoming unsustainable (power grid, roads and the like). It seems that the attitude of our nation has went from let's figure it out to we can't do that to that can't be done. Just thinking out loud which could be really dangerous.

This was my response:
Putting Curiosity safely on Mars??? It may seem ho-hum, but it was a big deal technologically speaking! Curiosity Lands On Mars: 10 Amazing Facts

And if you didn't watch the video of the NASA scientists and engineers as it was touching down, do it. You'll feel a sense of pride and joy as if you were watching the space shuttle take off or the Apollo movie all over again! Touchdown is at 2:37 in this video and when the first image comes back at 4:45, they cheer and celebrate all over again. This is the kind of thing that makes me feel pride in my country, but you know what - it wasn't just a USA effort alone - Curiosity cost $2.5 billion dollars. Any space venture from here on out really has to be a multi-nation effort because 1.) we can't afford to do it ourselves and 2.) space belongs to the entire human race, not just one country.
[youtube:17nblwm8]
[/youtube:17nblwm8]



I respectfully disagree. I think you will get more with competition between countries or companies in some things and collaboration in others. (ISS)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 12:43 #5 by OmniScience
Replied by OmniScience on topic Neil Armstrtong.

Science Chic wrote: Any space venture from here on out really has to be a multi-nation effort because 1.) we can't afford to do it ourselves..


Tell that to people like Elon Musk and Richard Branson.....

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304840904577426042171703270.html

SpaceX, which plans to launch NASA missions from the government's Cape Canaveral space complex in Florida, intends to set up a private launch facility of its own, most likely along the Gulf Coast. Its order book includes more than $1 billion of future satellite launches for commercial operators, foreign governments and research outfits. And the Air Force recently moved to make it easier for SpaceX to compete for launches of big military and spy satellites.


If they continue to be successful, who knows what they might be able to accomplish?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 12:51 #6 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Neil Armstrtong.
The space program is an investment in my view. Technology is a very valuable commodity for this country.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 16:01 #7 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Neil Armstrtong.
If you have the time you should read this. It is from 2008 but still a good argument

Vernikos on the R.O.I. of space travel: “Economic, scientific and technological returns of space exploration have far exceeded the investment. … Royalties on NASA patents and licenses currently go directly to the U.S. Treasury, not back to NASA.”
Cowing on space expenditures relative to other costs: “Right now, all of America’s human space flight programs cost around $7 billion a year. That’s pennies per person per day. In 2006, according to the USDA, Americans spent more than $154 billion on alcohol. We spend around $10 billion a month in Iraq. And so on.”


http://www.freakonomics.com/2008/01/11/ ... cs-quorum/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 17:13 #8 by ScienceChic
Replied by ScienceChic on topic Neil Armstrtong.

CinnamonGirl wrote: I respectfully disagree. I think you will get more with competition between countries or companies in some things and collaboration in others. (ISS)

I accept that you disagree, but I will respectfully disagree with you back! :) You are applying business basics to science, and while much is accomplished even in science due to fierce competition between labs to be the first to discover new knowledge and applicable products, you cannot discount the positive forces that come uniquely from collaboration. Scientists from Israel and Palestine work together, India and Pakistan, North and South Korea and it's these small initial efforts of working together that lead to greater understanding of each other and bigger peaceful relations between 2 nations that historically have fought one another. Collaborations allow scientists to share resources and knowledge leading to quicker discoveries. Most importantly, the divide between disciplines is quickly fading and the need to work with people who have expertise in other areas essential for success. For example, 30 years ago just focusing on isolating and sequencing individual genes was enough to make a career; now, that effort is mostly done and a geneticist has to explore what those gene products do - just having knowledge of genetics doesn't cut it, one has to know biochemistry, physics, math, molecular biology, and bioinformatics. Need help quick - find someone who's specialty is that who joins your team so you don't have to spend the time picking it up yourself because time is precious.

Heard of the Large Hadron Collider? 111 nations and over 10,000 scientists and they've already confirmed the Higgs boson and are working to learn even more and hopefully apply that to many useful applications, like cheap, safe energy production.

Google benefits of scientists collaborating and you'll see a lot more, but here's two that came up at the top:
Benefits of Research Collaboration
International scientific collaboration: a quick guide

The injection of business in science, is good too. I applaud and am excited at Musk's and Branson's involvement, as it is yet another piece of the puzzle to getting us permanently into space.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 17:36 #9 by LOL
Replied by LOL on topic Neil Armstrtong.

CinnamonGirl wrote: The space program is an investment in my view. Technology is a very valuable commodity for this country.


I respectfully disagree. LOL :)

Investment is a word that is way over-used by politicians. It can be smart spending with good value or dumb wasteful spending. Lets stop calling everything an investment and just spend wisely.

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2012 17:44 #10 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Neil Armstrtong.
Okay, I still think the investment is worth it. We spend more on many other things.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.151 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+