Combat troops? Talk about making something out of a sentence...I am sure Mitt wasn't referring to combat troops with his remarks, you just lumped them in. And combat troops would be paying taxes on any capital gains they made back home.
Meanwhile Obama's sequesteration would be putting many troops out of work, where is the compassion Barack? And the defense workers who will be getting severance checks for Christmas? Here kids, no gifts for you because Obama spent too much on failed green energy projects.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Are you saying that military troops deployed to combat zones do pay federal income taxes? Because they are actually part of the 47% that do not pay federal income taxes, that 47% that Mitt Romney denigrates as shirking personal responsibility. You were the one that implied that those 47% which include combat troops, combat veterans recuperating from traumatic injuries in VA hospitals and many other worthwhile individual doing great service for this country provide no value
So you are now objecting to Ryan's sequestration plan, the one put together by the House GOP and signed off by Ryan, Boehner and the House GOP majority. Perhaps you should be complaining to them.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
DIA rape victim wore to court the crucifix she says her attacker ripped from her throat before he sexually assaulted her.
Now, in your world that is means the attacker hates god! These are the ridiculous lines that get drawn around here. No objective thinking at all. Don't even try to find out what the other side really thinks.
CinnamonGirl wrote: Here is an example of your thinking.
DIA rape victim wore to court the crucifix she says her attacker ripped from her throat before he sexually assaulted her.
Now, in your world that is means the attacker hates god! These are the ridiculous lines that get drawn around here. No objective thinking at all. Don't even try to find out what the other side really thinks.
No, I would not say that at all. I can create ridiculous scenarios as well, but I don't stoop to that. If you wish to rebut my opinions, please do so honestly, don't make up ridiculous straw man scenarios designed to ridicule.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
CinnamonGirl wrote: Here is an example of your thinking.
DIA rape victim wore to court the crucifix she says her attacker ripped from her throat before he sexually assaulted her.
Now, in your world that is means the attacker hates god! These are the ridiculous lines that get drawn around here. No objective thinking at all. Don't even try to find out what the other side really thinks.
No, I would not say that at all. I can create ridiculous scenarios as well, but I don't stoop to that. If you wish to rebut my opinions, please do so honestly, don't make up ridiculous straw man scenarios designed to ridicule.
That was not designed to ridicule it was an example. Did I even mention partisan sides on it? I do realize I did not say that quite right 'your' I should have said some. My apologies.
