Unemployment Falls To 7.8% After 43 Months of 8% or Higher

08 Oct 2012 16:07 #71 by LadyJazzer
I'm sooo not interested in what the tin-foil-hat crowd has. If the President had such control over it, why didn't Bush exert his influence to cover up the 750,000-800,000 jobs/month that he was losing by the end of 2008? ("BLS commissioner Keith Hall, a Bush appointee, left in January, [2012]")

Isn't it interesting... I still can't get an answer to the question:

If the President had such control over it, why didn't Bush exert his influence to cover up the 750,000-800,000 jobs/month that he was losing by the end of 2008? ("BLS commissioner Keith Hall, a Bush appointee, left in January, [2012]")

Y'know, if you don't like Obama...Don't vote for him...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 16:11 #72 by FredHayek
So why elect Obama if you admit he can do nothing about jobs; energy prices; foreign affairs issues. Might as well elect a empty suit who makes nice speeches full of platitudes. Oh wait this is who America elected.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 16:16 #73 by LadyJazzer
That's a non-answer answer... (As usual...)

I admit none of the crap you suggest, because, as usual, it's not true.

Y'know, if you don't like Obama...Don't vote for him...

Since Mittens is in full Etch-a-Sketch mode, it's just a form of entertainment to see what he'll be tomorrow...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 16:37 - 08 Oct 2012 16:44 #74 by BearMtnHIB
[youtube:ipzg9o8q]
[/youtube:ipzg9o8q]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 16:40 #75 by FredHayek
:lol: Dem rules. Obama fails for 43 months of his term to get grades below 8% when he promises to get it below 6% after spending trillions. Finally he gets 7.8% on his final test and they want to let him get a graduate degree and another four years. Watch unemployment go back over 8% once he wins.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 20:52 #76 by Pony Soldier

Democracy4Sale wrote: I'm sooo not interested in what the tin-foil-hat crowd has. If the President had such control over it, why didn't Bush exert his influence to cover up the 750,000-800,000 jobs/month that he was losing by the end of 2008? ("BLS commissioner Keith Hall, a Bush appointee, left in January, [2012]")

Isn't it interesting... I still can't get an answer to the question:

If the President had such control over it, why didn't Bush exert his influence to cover up the 750,000-800,000 jobs/month that he was losing by the end of 2008? ("BLS commissioner Keith Hall, a Bush appointee, left in January, [2012]")

Y'know, if you don't like Obama...Don't vote for him...


I took a shot at an answer. Guess you didn't like it or have me on ignore.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 21:26 #77 by LadyJazzer

towermonkey wrote:

Democracy4Sale wrote: I'm sooo not interested in what the tin-foil-hat crowd has. If the President had such control over it, why didn't Bush exert his influence to cover up the 750,000-800,000 jobs/month that he was losing by the end of 2008? ("BLS commissioner Keith Hall, a Bush appointee, left in January, [2012]")

Isn't it interesting... I still can't get an answer to the question:

If the President had such control over it, why didn't Bush exert his influence to cover up the 750,000-800,000 jobs/month that he was losing by the end of 2008? ("BLS commissioner Keith Hall, a Bush appointee, left in January, [2012]")

Y'know, if you don't like Obama...Don't vote for him...


I took a shot at an answer. Guess you didn't like it or have me on ignore.


Nope.. Don't have you on Ignore... I just missed it somehow...

towermonkey wrote: One reason might have been that Bush wasn't running for re-election and Geezer and Gidget were a lost cause. I'm pretty sure changing the equation does mean manipulating the outcome but in this case, LOL's right, it does look like real job growth. Kudos to whomever is responsible.


You have to laugh... They've moved beyond "shooting the messenger"... Now they're declaring a "War on Facts"... rofllol :lol: But then for the RMoney-ites, it's been a fact-free campaign for months...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 21:37 #78 by FredHayek
No facts? All you have is speculation on what Mitt will do, you have four sub-par years of what Obama wil do let Congress shut him down again.

And latest from lefty site, [url=http://www.electoral-vote.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]www.electoral-vote.com[/url], Pelosi's campaign to take back the house will easily fail. Maybe the Dems will take back 6 seats.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 22:34 #79 by LadyJazzer
And a VERY LARGE list of his lies....

Mitt Romney tells 533 lies in 30 weeks, Steve Benen documents them

And this doesn't even count the 40 or so that he told during the debate...

Have fun! :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Oct 2012 22:43 #80 by Blazer Bob

Democracy4Sale wrote: And a VERY LARGE list of his lies....

Mitt Romney tells 533 lies in 30 weeks, Steve Benen documents them

And this doesn't even count the 40 or so that he told during the debate...

Have fun! :lol:


Sucks to be you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.165 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+