ANOTHER Mitt-Flop....Abortion...

Oh, NO... Another Mitt-Flop... After saying he supported "Roe v. Wade" and a "woman's right to choose"; and then having a "come-to-Jesus meeting' (so to speak) during the primaries, and becoming a "SEVERELY CONSERVATIVE" candidate who all of sudden believed in NO abortions, under ANY circumstances... We now have the latest attempt to "move toward the center", and "Mitt-flop" the "Mitt-Flop":

Mitt Romney Abortion Stance Changes, As Candidate Says He Won't Push To Restrict Access

Mitt Romney said Tuesday he has no plans to push for legislation limiting abortion, a softer stance from a candidate who has said he would "get rid of" funding for Planned Parenthood and appoint Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

“There’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda,” the Republican presidential nominee told The Des Moines Register in an interview.

Wait a minute... HOLD THE PRESSES.... Within 2 Hours, "the campaign had to 'walk it back'..."

The Romney campaign walked back the remark within two hours of the Register posting its story. Spokeswoman Andrea Saul told the National Review Online's Katrina Trinko that Romney "would of course support legislation aimed at providing greater protections for life."

His statement could put him at odds with congressional Republicans who have made limiting abortion central to their messages. His own running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), has introduced bills to restrict access to abortion. And the Republican Party platform toughened its anti-abortion stance earlier this year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/0 ... 52780.html

Is that like saying your health care plan "covers pre-existing conditions" in the debate...(Only to have "the campaign 'walk it back' within 2 hours after the debate is over, when everybody knew it was a complete lie in the first place??)

Dang I can't post these fast enough before the "campaign 'walks it back'...." Now we're down to posting the Mitt-Flop (from the second position back to the first position)...and then the "walk-back" of the "walk-back" in the same message. But when the Mitt-bot speaks, the TeaHadists must obey...

You CAN NOT make this sh*t up... rofllol rofllol

Yet half of this country is willing to entrust this country to the leadership of a man who has no idea what he believed and can't keep his positions straight from one day to the next. Early onset dementia?

Does it really matter? The President can't overturn Roe V. Wade.

Maybe not, but he can appoint supreme court judges who can.

archer wrote: Yet half of this country is willing to entrust this country to the leadership of a man who has no idea what he believed and can't keep his positions straight from one day to the next. Early onset dementia?

He apparently can't it keep it straight for any given 2-hour period...

Insert standard Mittens apologist crap here, along with standard deflection: (Please write legibly): _