"Paul Ryan finally had enough time to go through the math of the Romney tax plan during the vice-presidential debate. He didn't use it. Ryan filibustered instead. About the most specific he got was citing "six studies" he said vindicate the plan's mathematical plausibility.
So? We know the Obama budget doesn't work. Raise debt levels to 5 trillion dollars and create few jobs, and wind up with more unemployed people after four years.
All Obama has is spend money with stimulus spending that doesn't stimulate and soak the rich.
And we know that as opposed to your so called experts running it through models which may or may not be accurate.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
BTW, what is Obama's plan? Oh yeah, it is dead on arrival. Even the Dems in the House and Senate voted down his pipe dreams. What is worse, a plan that doesn't add up? Or Obama's plan that adds up to 5 trillion down the hole and Congress won't get fooled a second time.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: BTW, what is Obama's plan? Oh yeah, it is dead on arrival. Even the Dems in the House and Senate voted down his pipe dreams. What is worse, a plan that doesn't add up? Or Obama's plan that adds up to 5 trillion down the hole and Congress won't get fooled a second time.
So you're buying into Romney's campaign promise of 12 million new jobs?