Polls Favor Romney

[youtube:26crmob4][/youtube:26crmob4]

Sorry... We can't talk about polls because they're all "democrat over-sampled"...So, they're invalid... At least, that was the story a week ago. But y'all let me know how they turn out...

Oh, wow... Karl Rove on FauxNews... I may have to change my opinion... rofllol

Well....let's talk about intelligence then.

When Bush invaded Iraq, you went on and on about how he relied on bad intel.
Four Americans are dead and your guy claims bad intel.

Wonder if we can rely on the intel on Iran. Do they have good intel or bad intel.
You are the authority here LJ.
What is the answer?

And....if you read the numbers behind the samplings on these polls....they are still over sampling democrats.
Wonder what that means?

Becky wrote: Well....let's talk about intelligence then.

When Bush invaded Iraq, you went on and on about how he relied on bad intel.
Four Americans are dead and your guy claims bad intel.

Wonder if we can rely on the intel on Iran. Do they have good intel or bad intel.

Has Obama invaded Libya or Iran over the intel? Maybe I missed that part.

The difference is, Bush acted on the bad intel. Even he said afterward the "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq was bad intel.

It is actually likely that polls are oversampling democrats as there is an enthusiasm gap. They are basing the results on similar turnout to 2008, but it doesn't appear that will be the case. If you average all the polls, they are about even nationally with Obama still leading the electoral vote. It may be another case where the popular vote and the electoral college don't agree.

So...is the intel on Iran good or bad?