Forget the polls, Obama is still winning

Looks like a lot of states are in the margin of error.

Oh, and did I mention that Tammy Baldwin is leading Tommy Thompson by +6

And Tammy Duckworth is leading the teabagger Neanderthal, Joe Walsh, by +10



And Obama leads in Connecticut by +11
And in New Hampshire by +1.5

You gotta take what you can get.....right?

“[Nate] Silver’s facts are being fired like bullets into the heart of the Romney campaign.
--Dan Hodges has a great piece in The Telegraph today titled “Nate Silver, the geeky statistician who is singlehandedly dismantling the myth of Mitt-mentum”. It goes into great detail about the fantasy world that the Romney campaign is trying hypnotize American voters with, creating a completely false narrative that Obama is on the ropes and they are in the lead with all the momentum.
--As Hodges so perfectly shows, it’s a complete sham. And, thanks to Nate Silver and the FiveThirtyEight blog at the New York Times, most people aren’t buying it."



http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danho ... tt-mentum/

Raees wrote: “[Nate] Silver’s facts are being fired like bullets into the heart of the Romney campaign.
--Dan Hodges has a great piece in The Telegraph today titled “Nate Silver, the geeky statistician who is singlehandedly dismantling the myth of Mitt-mentum”. It goes into great detail about the fantasy world that the Romney campaign is trying hypnotize American voters with, creating a completely false narrative that Obama is on the ropes and they are in the lead with all the momentum.
--As Hodges so perfectly shows, it’s a complete sham. And, thanks to Nate Silver and the FiveThirtyEight blog at the New York Times, most people aren’t buying it."

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danho ... tt-mentum/

And I just got word that when Obama wins, Mourdock will make a statement that it was "God's will....."

as an independant I don't buy into any one news source exclusively.
I read I research and make my decisions based on all the available info I can.

that said I feel the HuffPo breakdown is, obviously biased butt I expect that from them
Fox=useless as is most of the crap the right is putting out as well.

it is hard to find an accurate non-partison breakdown butt, without a doubt,
Big O is trending down week by week as Rmoney is clearly trending up


Butt quoting a graph from a a U.K Blogger
You find that accurate? or even relevant?

And remember, this is the media, they want you to keep watching, pretending this is still close helps ratings.

You guys kill me. "Pretending it's close"... hahahaha It IS close.

500, the graph is from the FiveThirtyEight group at the New York Times and the "blogger" from the UK is a political columnist for The Telegraph, the leading newspaper in the UK, which you'd know if you bothered to read the link. He is writing about the findings of the statistician behind the FiveThirtyEight group.

So your "a graph from a UK blogger" is what is not accurate in your post, 500.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

BTW, if you click on the Senate graphs, it shows a clear trend to Democrats keeping control of the Senate.

Dems winning back control of the Senate? You mean Harry Reid is a Republican?