Debate #3, the Final Chapter

23 Oct 2012 09:00 #51 by LadyJazzer
Gee, it's a good thing he said "FEWER bayonets", and not: "NO bayonets"... Then you would have nothing else to snark about... :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 09:05 - 23 Oct 2012 09:21 #52 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic Debate #3, the Final Chapter

Heisenberg wrote: You morons still talking about binders? rofllol :lol:


Big Bird, Binders, Bayonets and Battleships. :wink:

How long did you guys go on about "57 states"?? That flub was during the last campaign and it's still being brought up.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 09:18 #53 by BearMtnHIB

Yes...And RMoney wants to increase it by $5 Trillion in tax-cuts, and $2 Trillion in defense spending that the DoD hasn't asked for... How will he pay for this $7 Trillion?

He already said how we are paying for it- by growing the economy and expanding the tax base. But you liberals don't hear anything- it comes in one ear and out the other, because there's nothing but void space in between.

Look- at this point- there's only the most low information voter left - and these voters don't care much about foreign policy. in fact Americans in general don't care much about foreign policy.

About the only two issues most people even care about is keeping us safe, and preventing terrorist attacks. I think the robot did a good job on those issues.

Also- this last debate Romney was looking to get a few more of the women's votes- which is why he didn't hardly attack Obama at all. I would have liked to see him slap Obumer around a little more- but women are all about emotion and stuff- so he was trying to be peaceful by not attacking Obumer.

Romney won the debate in my opinion- because he pointed out where Obama's policy has failed- mostly here at home. But the proof will be in the trends- and the trends are moving towards Romney.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 12:25 #54 by ScienceChic
Just FYI, the 3rd Party candidates are starting to team up to fight this monopoly that the Republicans and Democrats have on our election process. Maybe it is too late for this election, but I think it's the start of something big.

Email from Jill Stein's Campaign Manager:

Yesterday, Monday, October 22nd, Florida attorney Kathleen Kirwin filed an emergency complaint on behalf of Dr. Jill Stein requesting an injunction against the bipartisan presidential "debate" sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), Lynn University, the Democratic and Republican national committees, and approved by the Federal Election Commission. The injunction request was denied, and the bipartisan campaign event was allowed to proceed.

Yesterday's emergency complaint was made possible in large part through the generous support of a Libertarian Party member who wants to see the Greens and the Libertarians, as the nation's two largest independent parties, cooperate more in the fight for free elections. Last Thursday, the presidential campaign of Governor Gary Johnson filed a court challenge to the CPD's "debates" in Washington D.C..

The hope is that these actions form a new beginning to an alliance between the Libertarians and the Greens in taking on the corporate domination of our republic.


"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 12:32 #55 by Pony Soldier
They need to get Rocky Anderson (J) involved. I heard that guy interviewed the other day and actually liked what he had to say. We need to get these corporate hacks out of our government.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 12:40 #56 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Debate #3, the Final Chapter

akilina wrote: Enjoyed this debate more because there was more actual discussion than put downs. Rumney was more presidential and Obuma could have helped himself more by not being so defensive which makes him look weak.


I don't know, Obama's thing about 'we have these things called Aircraft Carriers". That we way over the top.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 12:45 #57 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic Debate #3, the Final Chapter

Science Chic wrote: Just FYI, the 3rd Party candidates are starting to team up to fight this monopoly that the Republicans and Democrats have on our election process. Maybe it is too late for this election, but I think it's the start of something big.

Email from Jill Stein's Campaign Manager:

Yesterday, Monday, October 22nd, Florida attorney Kathleen Kirwin filed an emergency complaint on behalf of Dr. Jill Stein requesting an injunction against the bipartisan presidential "debate" sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), Lynn University, the Democratic and Republican national committees, and approved by the Federal Election Commission. The injunction request was denied, and the bipartisan campaign event was allowed to proceed.

Yesterday's emergency complaint was made possible in large part through the generous support of a Libertarian Party member who wants to see the Greens and the Libertarians, as the nation's two largest independent parties, cooperate more in the fight for free elections. Last Thursday, the presidential campaign of Governor Gary Johnson filed a court challenge to the CPD's "debates" in Washington D.C..

The hope is that these actions form a new beginning to an alliance between the Libertarians and the Greens in taking on the corporate domination of our republic.

It will be very difficult to have a competitive third party and nearly impossible to have a fourth. They need to come up with a new name that merges the Libertarians and the Greens somehow. This new party could syphon off some of the black voters from the Dems due to decades of failed policies and they could grab some of the Repubicans who are socially liberal and are tired of the religious influence on the party. There's also a chance that the new party could inspire non-voters to get off their lazy asses and vote for once. I don't know if I would be voting for this party but if they had candidates that understood economics and how to pay down the debt, I'd give them serious consideration.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 12:58 #58 by FredHayek
I saw Gary Johnson on FoxNews this weekend analyzing last week's debate. For him, Romney & Obama are peas in the same pod. And he also commented on his own debate with Jill Stein, and thought she was a hopeless greenie who thinks investment in green energy will solve the high unemployment rate.
He also mentioned his lawsuit.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 13:33 #59 by Martin Ent Inc

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Oct 2012 14:22 #60 by LadyJazzer
Actually, the president didn't say we don't use them. He said we use fewer of them... Which is true. But then, facts have never been your strong suit.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.182 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+