Elect Mitt: You're electing every Right-Wing Nut he's pander

Bill Maher's Mitt Romney Warning: 'When You Elect Mitt You're Electing Every Right-Wing Nut He's Pandered To In The Last 10 Years' (VIDEO)

[youtube:25qn5sni]

[/youtube:25qn5sni]

If you're a moderate considering voting for Mitt Romney, there are certain facts you should know... according to Bill Maher. While you may not think the two candidates are terribly different, in Maher's opinion, only one of them is poised to release the Kraken in terms of the religious right:

"When you elect Mitt you're electing every right wing nut he's pandered to in the last 10 years. If the Mitt-mobile does roll into Washington it'll be towing behind it the whole anti-intellectual, anti-Science freakshow."

Watch Maher's stern warning to voters above and let us know what you think. Would President Romney stand-up to the zealot-side of his party or are "standing up" and "Mitt Romney" mutually exclusive concepts?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/2 ... 30187.html

Now THIS I find "interesting.....

I will give Bill all the respect and consideration he gives his right wing guests. None.

Why do you even bother to respond.....She is a nut like VL.

Oh, you mean like O'Reilly gives to his liberal guests?

O'Reilly says university professor looks like cocaine dealer

Democracy4Sale wrote: Oh, you mean like O'Reilly gives to his liberal guests?

O'Reilly says university professor looks like cocaine dealer

And the guest said "so do you".. it was a joke you dumbass. Try watching something in context for once instead of being fed bits and pieces by trash like Madcow.

Heisenberg wrote: . it was a joke you dumbass.

You just can't post without the personal insult. I would agree it was just a joke, but sheesh....why be so obnoxious about it?

What gets me out these guys like LJ, Raees and archer is that they skim these headlines for anything negative they can find. I am getting more and more convinced that they actually don't read or watch much of the stuff they post.
The video about Oreilly is a great example.
had anyone of those guys actually watched it....they would have clearly understood the context and not embarrassed themselves with goofy crap.....but nope.....they can't or won't do it.
I read their links. i watch their videos. I ultimately reject them but at least I read and watch.

Becky wrote: What gets me out these guys like LJ, Raees and archer is that they skim these headlines for anything negative they can find. I am getting more and more convinced that they actually don't read or watch much of the stuff they post.
The video about Oreilly is a great example.
had anyone of those guys actually watched it....they would have clearly understood the context and not embarrassed themselves with goofy crap.....but nope.....they can't or won't do it.
I read their links. i watch their videos. I ultimately reject them but at least I read and watch.

Really? when was the last time I posted a video.....or just a headline? I thought that was your modus operandi.....remember the night you posted thread after thread of right wing nonsense?

Why yes i do archer....I was trying to make a point.....you obviously missed it.
You routinely respond to posts in a similar fashion without benefit of actually reading the material you are posting on.
Would you like some examples....I have some free time tonight. It's a slow night for TV.

Or you are electing a moderate who won't let the TEA party shut down the country moving forward like Obama has?