
F**K the blood sucking unions.
Since folks will not read here's part of the article:"provides a list of union-approved candy highlights from the directory including
Baby Ruths, Butterfingers, Caramellos, Hershey’s Candy Corn Kisses, Hershey’s Extra Dark Chocolate bars, Hershey’s Hugs, Hershey’s Kisses, Hershey’s Nuggets, Jelly Belly candies, Kit Kats, Laffy Taffy, Mike and Ikes, Rolos, Super Ropes, Tootsie Rolls and Trolli candies.
She notes the goodies are largely the products of the
Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers (BCTGM) and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW).
Read more:
http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/26/afl-c ... z2AnG8RoZZ
"Tobacco Workers" WTH? aren't we told that tobacco makers, smokers, & they're products, EVIL SATAN'S SPAWN?
Didn't michelle command U.S. not to eat certain items? (paraphrase)
"YOU WILL EAT WHAT I TELL YOU TOO, I COMMAND IT!"
After a year as First Lady, she undertook her first lead role in an administrationwide initiative. Her goal was to make progress in reversing the 21st century trend of childhood obesity.[127] She stated that her goal is to make this effort her legacy: "I want to leave something behind that we can say, ‘Because of this time that this person spent here, this thing has changed.’ And my hope is that that’s going to be in the area of
childhood obesity."[127] She has named the movement "Let's Move!".[128]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_LaVaughn_Robinson_Obama#Public_image_and_style
How can the afl-cio promote CANDY, when the persons they support tell U.S. Not to eat the candy?
How can michelle take the Money that the afl-cio donates when she knows they promote candy?
As a reminder to the left:
Hypocrisy
is the state of promoting or administering virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually have or is also guilty of violating.[1] Hypocrisy often involves the deception of others and thus can be considered a kind of lie.[1]
Hypocrisy is not simply failing to practice those virtues that one preaches. Samuel Johnson made this point when he wrote about the misuse of the charge of "hypocrisy" in Rambler No. 14:
Nothing is more unjust, however common, than to charge with hypocrisy him that expresses zeal for those virtues which he neglects to practice; since he may be sincerely convinced of the advantages of conquering his passions, without having yet obtained the victory, as a man may be confident of the advantages of a voyage, or a journey, without having courage or industry to undertake it, and may honestly recommend to others, those attempts which he neglects himself.[2]
Thus, an alcoholic's advocating temperance, for example, would not be considered an act of hypocrisy as long as the alcoholic made no pretense of constant sobriety
VOTE!