Two MORE Losses for the Righties....

29 Oct 2012 21:08 #1 by LadyJazzer
And by the way... Two new things from SCOTUS:


Oklahoma 'Personhood' Ballot Amendment Appeal Rejected By Supreme Court

So much for the "Personhood" silliness....


Supreme Court Takes No Action On Voting Rights Act

So much for the Right-wing attempt to gut the Voter Rights Act of 1965



You lose....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2012 21:17 #2 by FredHayek
One gain? Because of Frankenstorm, early voting has been closed in Ohio.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2012 21:18 #3 by LadyJazzer
You might actually READ the Voter Rights article before you presume that it has anything to do with Ohio....

Just a suggestion...

The basic question is whether state and local governments that once boasted of their racial discrimination still can be forced in the 21st century to get federal permission before making changes in the way they hold elections.

Some of the governments covered – most of them are in the South – argue they have turned away from racial discrimination over the years. But Congress and lower courts that have looked at recent challenges to the law concluded that a history of discrimination and more recent efforts to harm minority voters justify continuing federal oversight.

The requirement currently applies to the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. It also covers certain counties in California, Florida, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota, and some local jurisdictions in Michigan and New Hampshire. Coverage has been triggered by past discrimination not only against blacks, but also against American Indians, Asian-Americans, Alaskan Natives and Hispanics.

Before these locations can change their voting rules, they must get approval either from the U.S. Justice Department's civil rights division or from the federal district court in Washington that the new rules won't discriminate.


ALEC and the TeaFascists have been trying to get rid of that provision for years.... Sorry...You lose.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2012 21:21 #4 by FredHayek
Irony? The Civil Rights voting acts were intended to make sure southern Dems stopped denying African Americans the right to vote.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Oct 2012 21:21 #5 by LadyJazzer
Have a nice day... :lol: :Snooze

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.186 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+