Raees wrote: I have zero doubt where the investigation leads, the right still won't be satisfied.
I would bet there is a lot more to be found out. The press just isn't into journalism anymore. They are just cheerleaders for a party.
My guess is this...if Obama loses, the press will want to gain back some semblance of their old "journalistic integrity" for the future, and they will investigate Benghazi, and we will hear the truth. If Obama wins, nothing will happen, and this topic will die.
Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!
Democracy4Sale wrote: It should have died already...
Ah yes, but when a black kid gets shot by a "white Hispanic", you and the press jump on that for weeks and weeks wanting immediate answers... even Obama had to chime in and make race an issue. But with Benghazi, it's just four brave Americans that were left unprotected by an inept administration and we shoud just all let it . Some of you people are the biggest partisan hypocrites I've ever seen. The families of these four people deserve at least as much attention from the media as the family of Trevon... but alas there is only one network willing to DO IT's JOB!
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
It was sad to see all the excuses made here for administration ineptitiude. I think at best we will get more security at embassies in dangerous nations. The press has little reason to cover the story now.
Really, a video trailer that had only been viewed 300 times inspired a riot with military hardware including mortars?
Time to pardon the director.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I told ya nobody cared about Bengazi..After being lied into a war where over a million people died for no reason whatsover, why would we care about a few office workers now?
FredHayek wrote: It was sad to see all the excuses made here for administration ineptitiude. I think at best we will get more security at embassies in dangerous nations. The press has little reason to cover the story now.
Really, a video trailer that had only been viewed 300 times inspired a riot with military hardware including mortars?
Time to pardon the director.
So you believe that the Republicans will quit cutting the budget for embassy security?
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
I will be interested to see what transpired when.... when all the facts come out. I'm still wondering about that Admiral that got relieved and if that's connected. If the Marine on the ground was "painting" a target, something was obviously inbound to take it out. Who called them off? This will all come out in public hearings. I fully expect Hillary to resign her position in the administration and that will be the end of any 2016 talk.
FredHayek wrote: It was sad to see all the excuses made here for administration ineptitiude.
Hey Birdbrain... lol The president doesnt micro manage security for every single of the tens of thousands of American intallastions around the world? He doesnt handle the security or the housekeeping, the motor pool, or the food in the cafeteria either...He's the President, theres a chain of command and there are about 25 highly ranked people between him and decisions involving such things..
But lieing us into a war that results in the deaths of ONE MILLION innocent people is all on a President (George Bush Jr)....We swallowed that be were supposed to be all upset about Benghazi?