- Posts: 1849
- Thank you received: 0
ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
- bailey bud
-
Topic Author
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
02 Nov 2012 08:35 #1
by bailey bud
ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement was created by bailey bud
I'm sure FH noticed - but the ECONOMIST published the most long-winded non-endorsing
endorsement I've ever read.
Obama supporters should notice the magazine's stinging (and accurate) criticism of the President.
endorsement I've ever read.
America could do better than Barack Obama; sadly, Mitt Romney does not fit the bill
Obama supporters should notice the magazine's stinging (and accurate) criticism of the President.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rick
-
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 13366
- Thank you received: 149
02 Nov 2012 08:39 #2
by Rick
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
George Orwell
Replied by Rick on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
Sounds like something you would right...no offense.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
George Orwell
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Photo-fish
-
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 3975
- Thank you received: 14
02 Nov 2012 08:40 #3
by Photo-fish
´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>
Replied by Photo-fish on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
Agreed. Lesser of 2 evils, better the devil you know and all that.
´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FredHayek
-
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 25647
- Thank you received: 144
02 Nov 2012 08:44 #4
by FredHayek
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Replied by FredHayek on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
Sort of like the Denver Post's endorsement. More an Obama is bad, but not as bad as we expect Mitt to be.
The expectations for Reagan weren't very high either.
The expectations for Reagan weren't very high either.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The 500 Foundation
-
- Mountain Advisor
-
Less
More
- Posts: 184
- Thank you received: 0
02 Nov 2012 08:51 #5
by The 500 Foundation
Replied by The 500 Foundation on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
<!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href="
285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24164
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24164<!-- l -->
what does intellectual honesty mean anyway?
what does intellectual honesty mean anyway?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bailey bud
-
Topic Author
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1849
- Thank you received: 0
02 Nov 2012 09:11 #6
by bailey bud
Replied by bailey bud on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
500 I apologize ---- my bad - I didn't notice that earlier post.
Raees linked to Forbes, which reported on the Economist endorsement (I linked to the actual article)
HE --- yes, I'd say that my thinking is very similar to the Magazine.
They're noting to the same issues I've been bugged by for awhile.
Raees linked to Forbes, which reported on the Economist endorsement (I linked to the actual article)
HE --- yes, I'd say that my thinking is very similar to the Magazine.
They're noting to the same issues I've been bugged by for awhile.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- The 500 Foundation
-
- Mountain Advisor
-
Less
More
- Posts: 184
- Thank you received: 0
02 Nov 2012 09:21 #7
by The 500 Foundation
Replied by The 500 Foundation on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
No worries on my end BB
I find it a far stretch to call it an endorsement as well
in reality it was more like acceptance by default
People will see into it what they wish to see
I find it a far stretch to call it an endorsement as well
in reality it was more like acceptance by default
People will see into it what they wish to see
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bailey bud
-
Topic Author
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1849
- Thank you received: 0
02 Nov 2012 09:35 #8
by bailey bud
Replied by bailey bud on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
hey - I called it a stinging (and accurate) criticism......
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LOL
-
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6393
- Thank you received: 18
02 Nov 2012 09:50 #9
by LOL
If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2
Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.
Replied by LOL on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
The article made some good points. Except leaving out the fact that evaluating a candidates past record and achievements should outweigh campaign rhetoric and pledges. They are clearly both flip-flopping politicians pandering to the voters.
If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2
Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Raees
-
- Mountain Legend
-
Less
More
- Posts: 3724
- Thank you received: 0
02 Nov 2012 09:53 #10
by Raees
Why am I not surprised you don't know what this is?
Replied by Raees on topic ECONOMIST pens a long non-endorsing endorsement
The 500 Foundation wrote: what does intellectual honesty mean anyway?
Why am I not surprised you don't know what this is?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.173 seconds
sponsors
