Is Rubio the future?

In his speech, Rubio weaved together the personal and the economic. He discussed the importance of a stable family life to a stable economy, and how critical the success of the middle class is not just to the country’s financial situation, but also to its place in the world. American exceptionalism, Rubio said, is important to every nation, not just the United States.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/18/rubio ... can-party/

I really like this young man a lot.

You've become an obvious Troll

And why is that SM?

Wasn't me who baited you? It was simply a question. If you don't agree that he may be the future of the GOP then state your reason but your personal attacks are getting tiresome.

Becky wrote: And why is that SM?

Because


You can't be serious.

I wonder why Romney didn't want him as his VP pick?

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/19/r ... ed-for-vp/

It is a good question. I would have thought Florida would have been far more important to Romney than Wisconsin.

Why? Because he has a tan?

Soulshiner wrote: Why? Because he has a tan?

And you wonder why there are so few productive discussions?

What is funny is to see how much harder the liberals go after a woman or a minority who has the gall to not be a Democrat. Look how they treated Hilary and Palin once Barack was annoited.

Or what they did to Stacey Dash once she came out supporting Romney. Kid Rock didn't get any of that.

WHAT ON EARTH
RUBIO TO SCIENCE: DROP DEAD

"I'm not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that's a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States," Rubio told GQ's Michael Hainey. "I don't think I'm qualified to answer a question like that. At the end of the day, I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all."

Rubio continued, refusing to take a stance on the planet's age, which scientists have long estimated at 4.54 billion years.

"Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I'm not sure we'll ever be able to answer that," he said. "It's one of the great mysteries."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/1 ... f=politics

Well, he'll be loved by the TeaVangelists.... WIth people who don't discount SCIENCE---not so much...