Obama campaign spending vs. Romney campaign spending

23 Nov 2012 15:06 #1 by Raees


Carville marvels that Romney, a businessman whose core sales pitch was competent management, entrusted his campaign to second-rate crony consultants who were so divorced from reality that they had him convinced to the bitter end that victory was all but assured.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... z2D4XlN3DD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Nov 2012 06:37 #2 by The Boss
The logical conclusion being that we can all look forward to the day with the president runs all the businesses (well I guess then it would be one business) and we get this kind of efficiency in everything.

But wait I don't get it, I thought employers were supposed to share more of the fruits of the business with their employees, so in this case did Romney run his campaign the way that those on the left want owners to run their businesses? And then a supreme worshiper of the left is critical of him for doing this. My head is spinning as we try to merge business and government philosophy. Luckily I don't have to worry about it, the president will just take care of it and tell me what to think about this.

Still kind of interesting that Obama won his campaign by paying his employees like Walmart relative to Romney. This also shows how selfless the Obama team member were. With those skills they could have made 10x as much elsewhere and they stuck to Obama, oh wait, all those folks that got paid that small amount by Obama, likely have GOV JOBS for the next 4 years that will add up to more than what Romney paid and will produce nothing. So instead of campaign money funding their lives, we will use taxpayer money.

Just more propaganda from the propaganda princess, go report back to the Lmoney queen.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Nov 2012 19:33 #3 by FredHayek
Maybe America should have elected Axelrod instead of Barack. Both campaigns have been much better run than the White House. And money much better spent.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Nov 2012 20:03 #4 by LadyJazzer

FredHayek wrote: Maybe America should have elected Axelrod instead of Barack. Both campaigns have been much better run than the White House. And money much better spent.



And he's WHITE!... That should have made him much more palatable to at least 80% of the southern states and the GOTP in general...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Nov 2012 07:00 #5 by The Boss
I though Obama was a white as he was black?

Or is vanilla plain ice cream to you?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Nov 2012 07:13 #6 by 2wlady
Sadly, in this country, it's still "if you have a drop of black blood, you are black."

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Nov 2012 08:45 #7 by The Boss
Perhaps if we cannot communicate, there is no reason to communicate.

Blood is red and blue and skin is almost always a shade of brown. Black is the absence of light and or color.

Not making fun of you, just saying that perhaps this is all propaganda and we love it more than people.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.166 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+