Corporate Profits Reach Record High, While Workers Struggle

Jekyll wrote:

archer wrote:

Jekyll wrote:

archer wrote: Really Heisenberg, you want the posters on the left to call out VL, while those on the right never say a word against BearMtn, not even when he posted that all liberals should die? Don't hold your breath.

If Bear said that, I want to see it. Probably gets fed up and slings the insults like I do. Although it doesn't solve much, it feels good in the short term. Hell, you guys NEVER call each other out, hahahahaha.

And neither do you guys....Bears rant was quite some time ago, but most posters here remember it. It seems to be an unwritten rule here that whatever your own side posts is OK, so making a point of complaining about the other side not calling out their own is futile, don't ya think?

Did you just repeat yourself? W..T..F man. Anyway, I was never on here all the time like ya'll, just here recently. I asked you to basically SHOW me Bears "infraction", but never mind. Like I said, it takes one to know one. F.O.

BMH posted a tounge in cheek response to something. Archer and a few others latched onto that like a pit bull latches onto a steak and still won't drop it. Archer, you still haven't gotten a clue - You were trolled, and it was apparently a very sucessful troll.

It was not tongue-in-cheek, and you know it.

rofllol


First, you gotta pick the right bait...

I'm gonna stop short of saying I'm in favor, but lets just say that I want to keep all the options on the table.

Then you have to cast it out and wiggle it around a little...

Exactly. I'm also pretty sure it's on the way. Can't say that I'm opposed to it anymore.

Here's the thing scruff, the left's "vision" of America is a deal breaker. There are many of us who won't be enslaved by your "vision". We will turn and fight before that happens.

Then once you have one or two really good nibbles, Bam! you set the hook and have sucessfully trolled!

Their opinion does matter. We need to know who the enemy is after all. And I don't think we need to kill the entire left because I think if a few thousand of the main players fall, then the rest of you on the left will duck and run and shut up real quick. The main reason I think so is because I think the left lacks the integrity to stick to their beliefs once the bullets start to fly.

In other words - I think most of the left is gutless, made up of mostly girley men.

kum ba yah.

I'm sure he had no idea how sucessful that troll post would be. I've seen some last for a couple of months, but I've never seen so many trolling victims with the hook sunk so deep for so long.

You all are on a stringer and don't even know it :rofl

Hmmmm....now Bear is a troll, but VL is not? I've never seen so many trolling victims with the hook sunk so deep for so long. Apparently the entire right here is on a stringer and doesn't know it.....as much as they complain about VL's posts and want those of us on the left to denounce what he posts.

You can't have it both ways ntm....

archer wrote: Hmmmm....now Bear is a troll, but VL is not? I've never seen so many trolling victims with the hook sunk so deep for so long. Apparently the entire right here is on a stringer and doesn't know it.....as much as they complain about VL's posts and want those of us on the left to denounce what he posts.

You can't have it both ways ntm....

Do a little search, I've complimented VL on his trolling.

Oh My.

Well I think the corporations making money in this lousy economy will continue to do so- after all we have had 4 years run by Obama- and one would have thought that he would have solved the problem of record profits by now.

4 years and corporate profits are still up- I don't think your guy is doing such a great job. The fact is that in the new Obameconomy- only those with special skills still in demand will see their incomes go up. Everyone else is subject to supply and demand. Too many people with just basic labor skills- they will have no hope in an economy like this to make more than minimum wage.

So that's gonna suck- more jobs being lost- and more people fighting over minimum wage jobs- and a government that does everything it can to suck every penny out of those workers who are left.

If you think your socialist savior will save you personally- you might wind up disappointed. Natural law will prevail no matter what and in the end- the losers are those who have not prepared for this economy. And by losers I mean those without the right education- the right skills and experience that will remain in demand.

And many without the right skills call themselves democrats - it will suck to be them.

Most people with common sense realize that any corporation that fails to make a profit is a corporation no more. The second that a company no longer makes a profit- it's belly up and it can no longer create jobs or sustain any jobs. It's just a matter of time before all it's assets are sold off to the highest bidder.

Unless they get some Obama bailout bucks of course.

It's going to get worse- as companies manuver around Obamacare and all the taxes coming after Jan 1. It will be harder to make a good living- hey at least under Bush people still had jobs!

archer wrote: Hmmmm....now Bear is a troll, but VL is not? I've never seen so many trolling victims with the hook sunk so deep for so long. Apparently the entire right here is on a stringer and doesn't know it.....as much as they complain about VL's posts and want those of us on the left to denounce what he posts.

You can't have it both ways ntm....

Who's VL?

Jekyll wrote:

archer wrote: Really Heisenberg, you want the posters on the left to call out VL, while those on the right never say a word against BearMtn, not even when he posted that all liberals should die? Don't hold your breath.

If Bear said that, I want to see it. Probably gets fed up and slings the insults like I do. Although it doesn't solve much, it feels good in the short term. Hell, you guys NEVER call each other out, hahahahaha.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote:

We already know BearMtnHIB is up for killing anyone who doesn't agree with his politics.

LJ, come on. You don't know that. That is pretty inflammatory.

We do know that. BearMtnHIB is on the record advocating the death and violence of those who oppose his political viewpoints:
http://285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.ph ... e&start=30

BearMtnHIB wrote:

You are absolutely right, there certainly is no evidence that the right wing rhetoric would lead an unbalanced individual to violence against a Democratic politician.

If it does - that's just a bonus!

archer wrote:

BearMtnHIB wrote:

I'll file your
Quote:

Granny may have to pick up the tab on the difference. Sorry Granny - sometimes reality sucks.

with your other famous one about how anybody who doesn't agree with you should die.

Nice to know what you stand for.

Can you provide a source for this claim- or are you just twisting what I said again until it has a totally different meaning.

Typical Commie.

How interesting.....I went back to BaerMtnHIB's post on killing liberals and who would have guessed it but the offending words were taken from the original post.....but not to worry, I had quoted them in a post of my own

BearMtnHIB wrote: Their opinion does matter. We need to know who the enemy is after all. And I don't think we need to kill the entire left because I think if a few thousand of the main players fall, then the rest of you on the left will duck and run and shut up real quick.

Killing a few of the left would make life better for conservatives I guess, same as letting some seniors die....all to make life a little better for BearMtnHIB.

see the entire thread here:
http://285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.ph ... b&start=60

http://285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.ph ... l&start=20


He did try to delete the posts where he directly advocating killing liberals, but it is found in other quotes in the post.

Then we have his cheerleaders who seem to support his views such as CriticalBill, Outdoor338, Conifermtnman and others.

<!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href=" www.285bound.com/285forum/viewtopic.php?...hib+violence#p117694 " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=6&t=11044&p=117694&hilit=bearmtnhib+violence#p117694<!-- l -->
His original posts were when he celebrated the violence against Gibby Giffords and the death of her aide. He tried to later scrub the comments, but they were immortalized in other threads. He was and is a serious sociopath who should be carefully monitored.

Obama: ‘If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun’

Something the Dog Said wrote:

BearMtnHIB wrote:

You are absolutely right, there certainly is no evidence that the right wing rhetoric would lead an unbalanced individual to violence against a Democratic politician.

If it does - that's just a bonus!

So you believe the attempted murder of Rep. Gifford was a bonus?

BearMtnHIB wrote: Yes I do.

Something the Dog Said wrote: So now let see if the conservatives here follow BearMtnHIB's support for murder and violence against those who do not follow their political viewpoints, or condemn him for his views.

BearMtnHIB wrote:

I hope you are joking. What you seem to be saying is that you are in favor of physical violence to stop those with which you do not politically agree. Is that right?

Scruffy - I gotta give you credit because I think your the only leftie on here who can think a bit. I'm gonna stop short of saying I'm in favor, but lets just say that I want to keep all the options on the table.

archer wrote:

BearMtnHIB wrote: If America has to resort to violence in order to keep our once great country from falling into socialism - well - we gotta do what has to be done.

That's scary....considering the idea that we are falling into socialism is an opinion, not a reality. and about half this nation thinks the path we are on is the right one. Are you advocating a civil war of liberals against conservatives? Or a conservative takeover of the government and putting all the liberals in concentration camps.....what exactly are you advocatoing with that remark? Violence against fellow citizens because they have a different vision for America is one very big scary idea.

archer wrote:

BearMtnHIB wrote:

archer wrote: And if we won't be enslaved by the right's "vision" of America, where does that leave this nation? It never occurred to you that you are disenfranchising half of this nation? Or does their opinion, their vision, not matter because it isn't yours?

Their opinion does matter. We need to know who the enemy is after all. And I don't think we need to kill the entire left because I think if a few thousand of the main players fall, then the rest of you on the left will duck and run and shut up real quick. The main reason I think so is because I think the left lacks the integrity to stick to their beliefs once the bullets start to fly.

In other words - I think most of the left is gutless, made up of mostly girley men.

kum ba yah.

wow....just wow....I thought your last post was bad, this really takes the cake. You really advocate bullets flying to impose your opinions upon the rest of the country......you name the left as the "enemy".......I'd be careful who you express these plans to, you may find yourself on the FBI watch list. BTW....you are underestimating the left, bigtime, we are as passionate as the right on what we believe and why, but unlike you, we don't want to kill off the opposition, we know they will self destruct on their own with little or no help from us. Hatred like yours usually fails in it's attempt to take over the world, think Hitler, he may have had his day but in the end he was defeated, and so shall you and others who think like you.

Ok outdoor......you have been spouting off about the hate from the left.....here is your chance to step up to the plate and support or condemn someone who advocates killing anyone who disagrees with their "vision" of America.

archer wrote: Lets see, I have asked you, and outdoor and RT and most every other conservative here what they think of BearMtnHIB's call to kill all liberals who don't convert to conservatism and have yet to get an answer....

Tongue-in-cheek?....I think not...

Here...Let's repeat that part again....

Something the Dog Said wrote:

BearMtnHIB wrote:

You are absolutely right, there certainly is no evidence that the right wing rhetoric would lead an unbalanced individual to violence against a Democratic politician.

If it does - that's just a bonus!

So you believe the attempted murder of Rep. Gifford was a bonus?

BearMtnHIB wrote: Yes I do.