LadyJazzer wrote: Maybe some of them have to put up with elitist a**holes such as yourself that think that everyone who is not them is a "taker" instead of a "maker"... God, I love the smell of AynRandroid pukes in the morning.
After reading many of your post you come across as an elitist of the entitled and act as if you are proud of it. The problem with your post is that you can't use your own words to express your position without a parroted link from some liberal web quote. I would give you the benefit of the doubt if you could use your own words. Instead you sound of low intelligence.
Gmule, welcome to 285bound. Enjoy running around the mullberry bush. That is to say, enjoy all the b.s, and yes, I dish out a lot of it..............along with the all the lefties around here.
Edit: Off topic; I say "leftie" cause liberals are easy to pick out. I don't much like hard core conservatives (righties) either. However, I was shootin' with my Dad today and realized he had more trouble shooting as a leftie than I did as a rightie. Funny.
Jekyll wrote: Gmule, welcome to 285bound. Enjoy running around the mullberry bush. That is to say, enjoy all the b.s, and yes, I dish out a lot of it..............along with the all the lefties around here.
Sounds good, I swing both ways politically so I can take the heat from either side.
Jekyll wrote: Gmule, welcome to 285bound. Enjoy running around the mullberry bush. That is to say, enjoy all the b.s, and yes, I dish out a lot of it..............along with the all the lefties around here.
Sounds good, I swing both ways politically so I can take the heat from either side.
LadyJazzer wrote: Maybe some of them have to put up with elitist a**holes such as yourself that think that everyone who is not them is a "taker" instead of a "maker"... God, I love the smell of AynRandroid pukes in the morning.
I am not the one using a machine that makes cubes and constantly expecting it to produce spheres. Businesses are designed to make the owners wealthy, to concentrate wealth. I am the one that says we should limit wealth as a solution and an alternative to 1,000,000s of laws that have the same intent and don't work.
I did not suggest anyone was a taker, I suggested that perhaps people are taxed into being poor due to overspending by the govt, inefficient spending and regressive taxation policies like SS tax policy (not existence), sales tax, WC insurance mandates and the like.
LJ, the poor do pay pretty high taxes relative to their ability to pay, I thought you champion that concept all the time, and when this happens, they get more poor, simply be definition.
What's Andriod puke and I thought you were not that into that God stuff?
LadyJazzer wrote: Maybe some of them have to put up with elitist a**holes such as yourself that think that everyone who is not them is a "taker" instead of a "maker"... God, I love the smell of AynRandroid pukes in the morning.
I am not the one using a machine that makes cubes and constantly expecting it to produce spheres. Businesses are designed to make the owners wealthy, to concentrate wealth. I am the one that says we should limit wealth as a solution and an alternative to 1,000,000s of laws that have the same intent and don't work.
I did not suggest anyone was a taker, I suggested that perhaps people are taxed into being poor due to overspending by the govt, inefficient spending and regressive taxation policies like SS tax policy (not existence), sales tax, WC insurance mandates and the like.
LJ, the poor do pay pretty high taxes relative to their ability to pay, I thought you champion that concept all the time, and when this happens, they get more poor, simply be definition.
What's Andriod puke and I thought you were not that into that God stuff?
The poor pay more for everything starting with higher interest rates on credit. They often don't have enough means to take advantage of the cycles of the market so they miss out on that etc.
Some will say that they are a higher risk for loans which is understandable but taking advantage of someone that is desperate is not ethical. Some will say but they knew the terms of the loans and signed anyway. Most of us have probably not heard our children complain of being hungry with no money to buy food. Some of them are working jobs that probably pay just enough that they won't qualify for any assistance so they take these pay day loans or use credit cards to get by but the government keeps taking more and more in the form of taxes to pay for unneeded pork projects.
gmule wrote: The poor pay more for everything starting with higher interest rates on credit. They often don't have enough means to take advantage of the cycles of the market so they miss out on that etc.
Some will say that they are a higher risk for loans which is understandable but taking advantage of someone that is desperate is not ethical. Some will say but they knew the terms of the loans and signed anyway. Most of us have probably not heard our children complain of being hungry with no money to buy food. Some of them are working jobs that probably pay just enough that they won't qualify for any assistance so they take these pay day loans or use credit cards to get by but the government keeps taking more and more in the form of taxes to pay for unneeded pork projects.
